[clas12_rgk] Selected RGK runs for calibration

[markov]

Dear all,
I am just not sure that decoding will make much of a difference.
The reconstruction I am using is 6b.2.0, so it should pick up the TOF calibration properly.
I know Raffaella is still looking at the results of the 6b.2.0 with one of the RG A runs, so may be we really should wait until she has some results.
Nick.
> On May 24, 2019, at 11:24 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it> wrote:
> 
> Dear Nick, Brandon and Latifa,
> 
> after today's RGK meeting it has been pointed out that the TOF calibration for low energy particles should be done using at least the 6b.2.0 release.
> 
> Which decoding version is being used? If we are using the 6b.1.1 release, the TOF calibration is not expected to improve much with respect to the present one.
> 
> In this case it would be more efficient to wait another week before the complete run cooking...
> 
> Sorry for the late input...
> 
> Annalisa
> 
> Il 22/05/19 16:34, markov ha scritto:
>> Dear all,
>> I have started decoding.
>> Nick.
>>> On May 22, 2019, at 9:25 AM, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Correct
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On May 22, 2019, at 9:07 AM, markov <markov at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> I will start decoding soon.
>>>> As far as I understand, you want hipo4 for decoding/reconstruction, is it correct?
>>>> Thank you, Nick.
>>>>> On May 22, 2019, at 8:15 AM, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Nick and Brandon,
>>>>> 
>>>>> This cooking has the priority after RGA run 5038 and 5036 data processing for different calibrations and has the highest priority over any other cooking.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Latifa
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 5/22/19 8:12 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
>>>>>> Dear Brandon and Nick,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> following a telephone meeting with Latifa, it has been mentioned the necessity to identify reference runs to be cooked with the latest release for calibration purposes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would suggest to use the files:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 5700     @ 7.5 GeV
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 5893     @ 6.5 GeV
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The first has been used in the past for the same purpose and it would be nice to use it for comparison.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The latter is a standard good file at 6.5 GeV.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Annalisa
>>>>>> 
>> 
> -- 
> ================================================
> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
> INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it
> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
> Email: annalisa at jlab.org
> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
> 
>