[clas12_rgk] Selected RGK runs for calibration

[Annalisa D'Angelo]

Dear Nick,

yes, sorry I meant the reconstruction code..

The release 6b.2.0 should already be good enough for calibration 
purposes, however it may be wiser to have a final green light from 
Raffaella early next week. How long does it take to have a complete run 
decoded and reconstructed?


Thank you for the prompt response

All the best

Annalisa

Il 24/05/19 17:43, markov ha scritto:
> Dear all,
> I am just not sure that decoding will make much of a difference.
> The reconstruction I am using is 6b.2.0, so it should pick up the TOF calibration properly.
> I know Raffaella is still looking at the results of the 6b.2.0 with one of the RG A runs, so may be we really should wait until she has some results.
> Nick.
>> On May 24, 2019, at 11:24 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Nick, Brandon and Latifa,
>>
>> after today's RGK meeting it has been pointed out that the TOF calibration for low energy particles should be done using at least the 6b.2.0 release.
>>
>> Which decoding version is being used? If we are using the 6b.1.1 release, the TOF calibration is not expected to improve much with respect to the present one.
>>
>> In this case it would be more efficient to wait another week before the complete run cooking...
>>
>> Sorry for the late input...
>>
>> Annalisa
>>
>> Il 22/05/19 16:34, markov ha scritto:
>>> Dear all,
>>> I have started decoding.
>>> Nick.
>>>> On May 22, 2019, at 9:25 AM, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Correct
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On May 22, 2019, at 9:07 AM, markov <markov at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> I will start decoding soon.
>>>>> As far as I understand, you want hipo4 for decoding/reconstruction, is it correct?
>>>>> Thank you, Nick.
>>>>>> On May 22, 2019, at 8:15 AM, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Nick and Brandon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This cooking has the priority after RGA run 5038 and 5036 data processing for different calibrations and has the highest priority over any other cooking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Latifa
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/22/19 8:12 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear Brandon and Nick,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> following a telephone meeting with Latifa, it has been mentioned the necessity to identify reference runs to be cooked with the latest release for calibration purposes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would suggest to use the files:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5700     @ 7.5 GeV
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5893     @ 6.5 GeV
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The first has been used in the past for the same purpose and it would be nice to use it for comparison.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The latter is a standard good file at 6.5 GeV.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Annalisa
>>>>>>>
>> -- 
>> ================================================
>> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
>> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
>> INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
>> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it
>> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
>> Email: annalisa at jlab.org
>> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
>>
>>
>
-- 
================================================
Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it
Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
Email: annalisa at jlab.org
Tel: + 39 06 72594562