[clas12_rgk] Selected RGK runs for calibration

[markov]

Dear Annalisa,
it is already decoded, so it is done already.
Cooking will take about a day if a farm is available. I will be back on Monday and if we have a green light I can start reconstruction.
Nick.
> On May 24, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it> wrote:
> 
> Dear Nick,
> 
> yes, sorry I meant the reconstruction code..
> 
> The release 6b.2.0 should already be good enough for calibration purposes, however it may be wiser to have a final green light from Raffaella early next week. How long does it take to have a complete run decoded and reconstructed?
> 
> 
> Thank you for the prompt response
> 
> All the best
> 
> Annalisa
> 
> Il 24/05/19 17:43, markov ha scritto:
>> Dear all,
>> I am just not sure that decoding will make much of a difference.
>> The reconstruction I am using is 6b.2.0, so it should pick up the TOF calibration properly.
>> I know Raffaella is still looking at the results of the 6b.2.0 with one of the RG A runs, so may be we really should wait until she has some results.
>> Nick.
>>> On May 24, 2019, at 11:24 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Nick, Brandon and Latifa,
>>> 
>>> after today's RGK meeting it has been pointed out that the TOF calibration for low energy particles should be done using at least the 6b.2.0 release.
>>> 
>>> Which decoding version is being used? If we are using the 6b.1.1 release, the TOF calibration is not expected to improve much with respect to the present one.
>>> 
>>> In this case it would be more efficient to wait another week before the complete run cooking...
>>> 
>>> Sorry for the late input...
>>> 
>>> Annalisa
>>> 
>>> Il 22/05/19 16:34, markov ha scritto:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> I have started decoding.
>>>> Nick.
>>>>> On May 22, 2019, at 9:25 AM, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Correct
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 22, 2019, at 9:07 AM, markov <markov at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>> I will start decoding soon.
>>>>>> As far as I understand, you want hipo4 for decoding/reconstruction, is it correct?
>>>>>> Thank you, Nick.
>>>>>>> On May 22, 2019, at 8:15 AM, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dear Nick and Brandon,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This cooking has the priority after RGA run 5038 and 5036 data processing for different calibrations and has the highest priority over any other cooking.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Latifa
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 5/22/19 8:12 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dear Brandon and Nick,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> following a telephone meeting with Latifa, it has been mentioned the necessity to identify reference runs to be cooked with the latest release for calibration purposes.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I would suggest to use the files:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 5700     @ 7.5 GeV
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 5893     @ 6.5 GeV
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The first has been used in the past for the same purpose and it would be nice to use it for comparison.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The latter is a standard good file at 6.5 GeV.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Annalisa
>>>>>>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> ================================================
>>> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
>>> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
>>> INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
>>> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it
>>> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
>>> Email: annalisa at jlab.org
>>> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> -- 
> ================================================
> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
> INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it
> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
> Email: annalisa at jlab.org
> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
> 
>