[clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] draft of RGK request to CCC for pass1 data process

[markov]

Dear FX, this is a good point.
For now, I have used 7.5 GeV for both. I understand this is not entirely correct, but it is better than using RGA.
We will have a better estimate as soon as we cook something with 6.5 GeV
Nick.
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 6:26 PM, Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Nick
> 
> Can you provide details how this was estimated precisely?
> Are there 6.5 GeV runs recently cooked to perform this estimate
> 
> 6.5 GeV runs are fairly different from 7.5 GeV runs. They have different detectors, different triggers...
> 
> Best regards
> FX
> 
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:23 AM markov <markov at jlab.org <mailto:markov at jlab.org>> wrote:
> Dear Annalisa,
> I have looked at 5 runs cooked from the RGK recently, and the train and DST composition is different between RGA and RGK.
> I attach what I have found from RGK.
> Of course it will scale with your estimation of events number (which should be more precise compared to what I have).
> I have also added the amount of data to read from tape for the reconstruction (last line).
> Nick.
> <PastedGraphic-2.png>
>> On Feb 26, 2020, at 5:45 PM, Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org <mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Annalisa,
>> 
>> Please cancel my proposal. I will implement my suggestions the word file.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>>                                    Victor
>> From: clas12_rgk <clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org <mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 5:42 PM
>> To: Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it <mailto:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>>; clas12_rgk at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org> <clas12_rgk at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org>>; nick markov <markov at jlab.org <mailto:markov at jlab.org>>; Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org <mailto:latifa at jlab.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] draft of RGK request to CCC for pass1 data process
>>  
>> Hi Annalisa,
>> 
>> Could you put numbers for the strings of the text, if possible?
>> 
>>  Thank you!
>> 
>>  Best Regards,
>>                               Victor
>> 
>> 
>> From: clas12_rgk <clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it <mailto:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 3:45 PM
>> To: clas12_rgk at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org> <clas12_rgk at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org>>; nick markov <markov at jlab.org <mailto:markov at jlab.org>>; Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org <mailto:latifa at jlab.org>>
>> Subject: [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] draft of RGK request to CCC for pass1 data process
>>  
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> please find in attachment the draft of the request to CCC for pass1 data 
>> process of the full RGK data set.
>> 
>> I have linearly scaled Nick's estimations for RGA cooking.
>> 
>> All comments, suggestions, integrations, corrections are welcome and 
>> highly appreciated.
>> 
>> All the best
>> 
>> Annalisa
>> 
>> -- 
>> ================================================
>> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
>> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
>> Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
>> Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
>> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it <mailto:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>
>> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
>> Email: annalisa at jlab.org <mailto:annalisa at jlab.org>
>> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clas12_rgk mailing list
> clas12_rgk at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org>
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgk <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgk>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20200226/b11aa1a2/attachment.html>