[clas12_rgk] Fwd: Re: [EXTERNAL] Rg-K quality plots

[burkert]

These are for RGA it seems. Will he be showing similar ones for RGK?
Volker

On 6/3/20 10:27 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> please find in attachment the quality plots by Christopher Dilks.
>
> Timelines are available at:
>
> https://clas12mon.jlab.org/dilks/rgk_test/timeline/
>
> Annalisa
>
> -------- Messaggio Inoltrato --------
> Oggetto: 	Re: [EXTERNAL] Rg-K quality plots
> Data: 	Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:36:59 -0400
> Mittente: 	Christopher Dilks <dilks at jlab.org>
> A: 	Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>
>
>
>
> Dear Annalisa,
>
> Here are the timelines, along with some notes:
>
> https://clas12mon.jlab.org/dilks/rgk_test/timeline/
>
> -- beam spin asymmetry
> - pi+ beam spin asymmetry has the wrong sign, likely because RGK helicity
>   assignment is opposite what RGA and RGB use; it's simple to fix and 
> can be
>   done later when reading pass1 data. It is also interesting to note 
> that the
>   magnitude of the pi+ asymmetry is around 4% for RGK, but for RGA and 
> RGB it
>   is 2%.
>
> -- electron trigger yield normalized values
> - the four runs have a wide range of FC-normalized electron trigger 
> yields;
>   therefore the QA cuts are defined separately for each run. These 
> normalized
>   yields are nearly constant within each of the runs, except for the 
> first file of run
>   5958 (but that's perfectly normal, sometimes the first or last file 
> of a run does this)
>
> All the other timelines look normal, but there is a jump in the pion 
> pT between 5823 and 5893, as well as x and Q2
>
> I've also attached some slides which describe how the QA works, but 
> they are a bit out of date; in particular, an issue regarding the 
> livetime was fixed, so there's no longer a need for a livetime>1 
> defect bit.
>
> -Chris
>
> On 6/2/20 4:30 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
>> Dear Chris,
>> Thank you! I will include your plots in my summary presentation.
>> All the best
>> Annalisa
>> Il 02/06/20 04:01, Christopher Dilks ha scritto:
>>> Dear Annalisa,
>>>
>>> Yes, I can prepare timelines, but I'm not available this Friday 
>>> (June 5th) to give a presentation. I will send you an update when 
>>> they are ready.
>>>
>>> -Chris
>>>
>>> On 6/1/20 6:09 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
>>>> Dear Christopher,
>>>>
>>>> RG-K will face the pass1 review next Friday at 8:30 Jlab time. We 
>>>> have fully cooked four runs
>>>>
>>>> 5700, 5823, 5893, 5958
>>>>
>>>> that are available at:
>>>> /volatile/clas12/rg-k/production/pass0/v1_1.1.41/calib/train/
>>>>
>>>> Would you be available to run your quality plot codes on those 4 
>>>> runs, to show the potetntial of the dataset?
>>>> Would you be available to give a short presentation about the results?
>>>> Thank you in advance for your collaboration
>>>> Annalisa
>>>>
>>>
>
>
> This body part will be downloaded on demand.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20200603/bf6d60f0/attachment.html>