[clas12_rgk] [Hybrid baryons] [EXTERNAL] new rgk trains (clara 5.0.2 coatjava 10.0.2)
Izzy Illari
izzy at jlab.org
Tue Aug 1 16:28:34 EDT 2023
Dear all,
In head of tomorrow's meeting I looked at the ratios discussed by Daniel
and Volker at last meeting and in emails... I have attached the slides
here. I took ratios of missing mass squared distributions with focus on
eta mass range to compare pass2 with denoise/pass 1, pass2 no
denoise/pass 1, and then pass2 with denoise/pass 2 without denoise. I
also plotted the momentum distributions of the electrons and protons in
my final states and the ratios of those as well.
I see increased number of events from pass 1 to pass2, but not quite a
huge improvement from pass 2 with no denoise to pass 2 with denoise.
My question is the same as FX's: should there be anything else
investigated in order to wrap this up?
All the best,
Izzy
On 8/1/23 10:30 AM, Francois-Xavier Girod via clas12_rgk wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I compared train output under
> /volatile/clas12/rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v7/
> which I believe is the "old" pass 1 with
> /volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/denoise_1002/train/
> which should be the "denoise pass 2" (?)
>
> Here are the numbers I obtained
>
> DVCS pass 1 FD = 6564 , CD = 18318
> DVCS denoise FD = 8135 , CD = 31159
> DVCS gains FD = 23.9% , CD = 70.1%
>
> pi0 pass 1 FD = 4952 , CD = 12395
> pi0 denoise FD = 6606 , CD = 21126
> pi0 gain FD = 33.4% , CD = 70.4%
>
> phi pass 1 FD = 51.5
> phi denoise FD = 93.0
> phi gain FD = 80.6%
>
> Please let me know if there are additional comparisons or
> investigation I can perform to wrap this up
>
> Best regards
> FX
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:10 AM Annalisa D'Angelo
> <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it> wrote:
>
> Dear Lucilla,
>
> can you please point at the pass1 trains, please.
>
>
> Thank you in advance
> Annalisa
>
> -------- Messaggio Inoltrato --------
> Oggetto: Re: [Hybrid baryons] [EXTERNAL] new rgk trains (clara
> 5.0.2 coatjava 10.0.2)
> Data: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:42:08 -0400
> Mittente: Francois-Xavier Girod via Hybrid_baryons
> <hybrid_baryons at jlab.org> <mailto:hybrid_baryons at jlab.org>
> Rispondi-a: Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org>
> <mailto:fxgirod at jlab.org>, hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
> A: Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa at jlab.org> <mailto:annalisa at jlab.org>
> CC: hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
>
>
>
> Dear Annalisa, all
>
> Could someone point me out to the directories I should compare then?
> It will not take long to run my code again but I would rather not
> guess the files locations
>
> Thank you
>
> Best regards
> FX
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:39 AM Annalisa D'Angelo
> <annalisa at jlab.org> <mailto:annalisa at jlab.org> wrote:
>> Dear FX,
>>
>> thank you very much!
>>
>> It would be great if you could could compare results among pass1 and
>> pass2 with denoising. Please tell us if you need and any additional
>> input from us.
>>
>> Annalisa
>>
>> Il 31/07/23 17:22, Francois-Xavier Girod via Hybrid_baryons ha scritto:
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> I also analyzed the exclusive phi events since they have 4 charged
>>> particles in the forward detectors
>>> exclu phi integrated peak estimated events:
>>> no denoise : 75.7
>>> denoise : 93.0
>>> gain : 22.8%
>>>
>>> (raw spectra without fitting the peak gives: no denoise 1058, denoise
>>> 1181, gain 11.6%)
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> FX
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 9:55 AM Francois-Xavier Girod<fxgirod at jlab.org> <mailto:fxgirod at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>> Dear all
>>>>
>>>> Here are some deep exclusive reactions comparison results between "6.5
>>>> GeV no denoise" and "6.5 GeV denoise"
>>>>
>>>> DVCS no denoise FD = 7845 , CD = 30260
>>>> DVCS denoise FD = 8135 , CD = 31159
>>>> DVCS gains FD = 3.7% , CD = 3.0%
>>>>
>>>> pi0 no denoise FD = 6396 , CD = 20721
>>>> pi0 denoise FD = 6606 , CD = 21126
>>>> pi0 gain FD = 3.3% , CD = 1.9%
>>>>
>>>> skim20 "pip pim pi0" which should contain exclusive omega events is
>>>> not working for some reason I think
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> FX
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 5:12 PM Lucilla Lanza via Hybrid_baryons
>>>> <hybrid_baryons at jlab.org> <mailto:hybrid_baryons at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> You can find the new rgk trains (clara 5.0.2 coatjava 10.0.2) at:
>>>>>
>>>>> 6.5 GeV denoise (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990):
>>>>>
>>>>> /volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/denoise_1002/train/
>>>>>
>>>>> 6.5 GeV no denoise (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990):
>>>>>
>>>>> /volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/no_denoise_1002///train/
>>>>>
>>>>> 7.5 GeV no denoise (5682,5696,5700,5708,5734,5791):
>>>>>
>>>>> /volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/7546MeV/pass1/v19/no_denoise_1002///train/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if you have any comment or question.
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Lucilla
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il 2023-07-25 22:06 Raffaella De Vita ha scritto:
>>>>>>>> Dear Lucilla,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Daniel noticed the REC::Scintillator banks in the skims seem to be
>>>>>>>> corrupted. I did some investigation and found that the version of the
>>>>>>>> train that was run is based on an old coatjava version where the
>>>>>>>> REC::Scintillator bank was different than what it is now. This is
>>>>>>>> likely the cause of the problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We verified the skims can be recovered (with no need to rerun the
>>>>>>>> trains), replacing the bank schema in the files. This can be done
>>>>>>>> running the following command for each of the skim files;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hipo-utils -update -d
>>>>>>>> /group/clas12/packages/clara/5.0.2_10.0.2/plugins/clas12/etc/bankdefs/hipo4
>>>>>>>> -o recovered-skim.hipo original-skim.hipo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which basically restores the correct schema.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My suggestion is to create a new directory where to write the
>>>>>>>> recovered files with the same directory structure as the train
>>>>>>>> output.
>>>>>>>> Let me know if you have any questions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Raffaella
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 24 Jul 2023, at 09:28, Lucilla Lanza
>>>>>>>>> <lucilla.lanza at roma2.infn.it> <mailto:lucilla.lanza at roma2.infn.it> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the rgk dst files with (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990) and without
>>>>>>>>> (5682,5696,5700,5708,5734,5791,5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990)
>>>>>>>>> denoising applied are available for comparison (coatjava 10.0.2,
>>>>>>>>> timestamp 07/15/2023-03:00:00).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No denoising:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /volatile/clas12/rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass0/v0_cook_no_denoise_new/dst/recon/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Denoising:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /volatile/clas12/rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass0/v0_cook_denoise_new/dst/recon/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can find the corresponding skims with and without denoising
>>>>>>>>> applied at:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 6.5 GeV denoise (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/denoise/train/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7.5 GeV no denoise (5682,5696,5700,5708,5734,5791):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/7546MeV/pass1/v19/no_denoise/train/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 6.5 GeV no denoise (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/no_denoise/train/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any comment or question.
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lucilla
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Hybrid_baryons mailing list
>>>>> Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
>>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Hybrid_baryons mailing list
>>> Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons
>>
>> --
>> ================================================
>> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
>> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
>> Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
>> Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
>> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it
>> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
>> Email:annalisa at jlab.org
>> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hybrid_baryons mailing list
> Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clas12_rgk mailing list
> clas12_rgk at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20230801/595ad919/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CompareDenoise_1Aug2023.pptx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Size: 692889 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20230801/595ad919/attachment-0001.pptx>
More information about the clas12_rgk
mailing list