[Clas12_rich] Corners of Mirror C3 in ideal model not on same plane.
Marco Mirazita
Marco.Mirazita at lnf.infn.it
Wed Aug 3 04:38:56 EDT 2016
Hi Tyler,
I don't know exactly what you did, so I'm not sure what to say.
I did check the planarity of the 4 corners of each lateral side of the
mirrors using the coordinates Sandro extracted from the CAD.
This is what I did, it is in the code I sent to you some day ago.
Let's say A,B,C,D are the 4 corners of one side, from top left to bottom
right.
The normal to the plane is AC x DC.
Then I calculate the angle between the normal and the vector BC, it must
by 90 deg.
Here the output of my analysis code for mirror 3C, the angle is q1, as
you see it is 90 deg with deviations much smaller than 0.1 deg.
Marco
------------ SIDE: bottom
q1=89.9792
c=274.265 c1=274.01 c2=274.01 c3=274.265 c4=274.01
direction=-0.993213
------------ SIDE: right
q1=90
c=1.5 c1=1.5 c2=1.5 c3=1.5 c4=1.5
direction=-0.991527
------------ SIDE: top
q1=90.0003
c=-735.575 c1=-735.572 c2=-735.572 c3=-735.575 c4=-735.572
direction=-0.994331
------------ SIDE: left
q1=89.9929
c=-580.426 c1=-580.496 c2=-580.496 c3=-580.426 c4=-580.496
direction=-0.989051
Il 2016-08-02 14:18 Tyler Lemon ha scritto:
> Dear Sandro,
>
> We have been looking in AutoCAD at the ideal models for the RICH
> mirrors that you shared. We have noticed that for mirror C3, the four
> corners are not on a single plane. When a plane is fit using three
> corners, the fourth corner does not lie in the plane created. Is this
> an intentional design for the mirror? Please let us know.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tyler
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_rich mailing list
> Clas12_rich at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rich
More information about the Clas12_rich
mailing list