[Clas12_software] ced 1.006 with better CND data display

[Mikhail Osipenko]

Hi Dave,

eventually I understood my mistake: these two layers that I associated to 
FTOFs were actually LTCC! Sorry about that! Perhaps you might remove them, 
they are not there at least in most of the sectors and there is no use of 
them in on-line event display...

Thanks,
            Mikhail.


On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Mikhail Osipenko wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> there are some hits in FTOF (it is made of those two rows of bigger tiles 
> just after DC R3, right?), but 1) for most tracks which you see both in DC 
> (before FTOF) and in PCAL+EC (after FTOF) there are no hits in FTOF! They 
> must be there, moreover there must be a lot of random noise: FTOF is counting 
> few x100 kHz. Are you sure you plotting all hits? Is there any threshold or 
> requirement of two side L-R reconstruction?
>
> I would expect for every DC track to see the corresponding FTOF hit (plus 
> random noise), if it is not there we will not be able to reconstruct 
> anything.
>
> Thank you,
>              Mikhail.
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, David Heddle wrote:
>
>> I just went to the counting house and the FTOF hit rate on ced looked
>> normal. Not sure what else to do...
>> 
>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 11:21 AM David Heddle <david.heddle at cnu.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  I just looked at
>>> 
>>> /lustre/expphy/cache/clas12/rg-a/data/clas_005460/clas_005460.evio.00049
>>> 
>>> from today, and I see the usual number of FTOF hits. I will go to the
>>> counting house and check the on-line. An accumulation of 10k events looks
>>> normal
>>> 
>>> [image: image.png]
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 7:19 AM David Heddle <david.heddle at cnu.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I will check!
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, 5:52 AM Mikhail Osipenko <osipenko at jlab.org wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Dave,
>>>>> 
>>>>> are all FTOF hits shown for each event in CED? I looked both: the
>>>>> on-line
>>>>> visualization in counting house from ET-ring and off-line data files,
>>>>> apparently there are almost no FTOF hits. Perhaps one every 100 events.
>>>>> Even for very clear electron tracks with huge EC cluster the crossed
>>>>> FTOF
>>>>> does not show anything. I hope it is just visualization problem and has
>>>>> nothing to do with detector performance?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>              Mikhail.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> *David P. Heddle, Ph.D.Professor of Physics*
>>> *MS APCS Graduate Program Coordinator*
>>> 
>>> * Christopher Newport University Newport News, VA 23606*
>>> 
>>> *757.594.8434*
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> *David P. Heddle, Ph.D.Professor of Physics*
>> *MS APCS Graduate Program Coordinator*
>> 
>> * Christopher Newport University Newport News, VA 23606*
>> 
>> *757.594.8434*
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_software mailing list
> Clas12_software at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software
>