[Clas12_verystrange] meeting minutes

[Lei Guo]

HI, Igor,

I asked Bob. Waiting for his reply.
I also asked Diego, our reviewer. But he has not gotten back to me yet.

DVCS's conclusion on the field setting is good news for me. N* part is  
ongoing.
We know the main part is the field and PID, both dependent on the  
release of the "full" simulation program, that should happen by the  
collaboration meeting.
We should redo some of the acceptance study once the codes are  
released. For the PID, Mike, Eugene and I had discussions. ONce the  
reconstruction code is available, that should be done. We tried to do  
it before the PAC, but there wasn't enough time. Since now they  
require full simulation, I think it makes more sense to wait for that  
to happen.

I don't believe we need to go through HSG review. There is no deadline  
since PAC40 is not yet set, as far as I know. But we shouldn't have  
problem making it. Once the simulation code is released, we probably  
need a couple of more months to finish our study. Even if it is not  
released on time, we can still enlist Sebastien's help, since he is  
willing to run the simulation with his private reconstruction codes  
for us.

Lei
On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Igor Strakovsky wrote:

> Hi Lei,
>
> Can I ask you please several things...
>
> -First of all, do you have a list to-do to revise the proposal?
> Sure, it depends on the PAC Report which did not come yet.  Is it
> possible to ask Bob McKeown whois responsible for that?
>
> --For the low magnetic field, we have a reaction from DVCS and the
> N* reaction is coming soon, right?
>
> --How is about PID?
>
> --What else?
>
> -Is it necessary to go through the HSG review?
>
> -What is the actual deadline (schedule) for the resubmission of our
> proposal?
>
> Thanks, Igor
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:47:22 +0000, Lei Guo <leguo at fiu.edu> wrote:
>
>> We had a meeting today. Attendee: Eugene, Johann, Mike, John, and Lei
>>
>> Minutes:
>> 1. The only time that's good for everyone according to doodle is
>> Friday 11:30-12:00 (EST). We will have the first meeting at that time
>> on 10/19/12. Whether we switch to biweekly or weekly schedule,  
>> depends
>> on the outcome of the software release for CLAS12 simulation, during
>> the collaboration meeting.
>> 2. Eugene mentioned a talk during the collaboration meeting that will
>> address future 12GeV proposal policies, and encourages everyone to
>> attend that one.
>> 3. Dianne from GWU expressed interest in joining the very strange
>> group. She probably will work on some of the simulation tasks.
>> 4. Gleb (working with Ralf) is trying to determine the effect of B
>> field on the N* physics. He is in contact with Sebatien to use his
>> reconstruction code.
>> 5. Johann is looking into the calculation of double moments errors.
>>
>> That's all.
>>
>> Lei
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange