[Clas12_verystrange] meeting minutes

[Igor Strakovsky]

Hi Lei,

Thank you for your clarification.  As far as I can recall correctly,
Volker inform CLAS folks about a PAC40 schedule but I forgot when.

Cheers, Igor

On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:30:22 +0000, Lei Guo <leguo at fiu.edu> wrote:

> HI, Igor,
> 
> I asked Bob. Waiting for his reply.
> I also asked Diego, our reviewer. But he has not gotten back to me yet.
> 
> DVCS's conclusion on the field setting is good news for me. N* part is  
> ongoing.
> We know the main part is the field and PID, both dependent on the  
> release of the "full" simulation program, that should happen by the  
> collaboration meeting.
> We should redo some of the acceptance study once the codes are  
> released. For the PID, Mike, Eugene and I had discussions. ONce the  
> reconstruction code is available, that should be done. We tried to do  
> it before the PAC, but there wasn't enough time. Since now they  
> require full simulation, I think it makes more sense to wait for that  
> to happen.
> 
> I don't believe we need to go through HSG review. There is no deadline  
> since PAC40 is not yet set, as far as I know. But we shouldn't have  
> problem making it. Once the simulation code is released, we probably  
> need a couple of more months to finish our study. Even if it is not  
> released on time, we can still enlist Sebastien's help, since he is  
> willing to run the simulation with his private reconstruction codes  
> for us.
> 
> Lei
> On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Igor Strakovsky wrote:
> 
>> Hi Lei,
>>
>> Can I ask you please several things...
>>
>> -First of all, do you have a list to-do to revise the proposal?
>> Sure, it depends on the PAC Report which did not come yet.  Is it
>> possible to ask Bob McKeown whois responsible for that?
>>
>> --For the low magnetic field, we have a reaction from DVCS and the
>> N* reaction is coming soon, right?
>>
>> --How is about PID?
>>
>> --What else?
>>
>> -Is it necessary to go through the HSG review?
>>
>> -What is the actual deadline (schedule) for the resubmission of our
>> proposal?
>>
>> Thanks, Igor
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:47:22 +0000, Lei Guo <leguo at fiu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> We had a meeting today. Attendee: Eugene, Johann, Mike, John, and Lei
>>>
>>> Minutes:
>>> 1. The only time that's good for everyone according to doodle is
>>> Friday 11:30-12:00 (EST). We will have the first meeting at that time
>>> on 10/19/12. Whether we switch to biweekly or weekly schedule,  
>>> depends
>>> on the outcome of the software release for CLAS12 simulation, during
>>> the collaboration meeting.
>>> 2. Eugene mentioned a talk during the collaboration meeting that will
>>> address future 12GeV proposal policies, and encourages everyone to
>>> attend that one.
>>> 3. Dianne from GWU expressed interest in joining the very strange
>>> group. She probably will work on some of the simulation tasks.
>>> 4. Gleb (working with Ralf) is trying to determine the effect of B
>>> field on the N* physics. He is in contact with Sebatien to use his
>>> reconstruction code.
>>> 5. Johann is looking into the calculation of double moments errors.
>>>
>>> That's all.
>>>
>>> Lei
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange

Igor Strakovsky, SAID CNS The George Washington University
Tel: 703-726-8344(NV),202-994-4742(FB),Skype: igors1945_2
Fax: 202-994-3001(FB),Emails: igor at va.gwu.edu, igor at jlab.org