[Clas12_verystrange] new proposal

Lei Guo leguo at fiu.edu
Tue Mar 26 20:16:48 EDT 2013


Hi, Guys,

I've made a few changes to the proposal they are in svn now, including  
the pdf file.

Authorlist: Added Diane and Will
beam.tex (last section): I changed the projected particle rates. I  
used an overall weighted efficiency, replacing what was called overall  
efficiency, for Omega and Xi-(1820), based on 80days full field and  
30days reversed field, comapred with previous assumption of 80days  
half field. The multiplication factor for Omega-(3k) is 0.59, Omega- 
(4k) is 0.48, and XI-(1820) is 0.82.
I updated omegaEX.tex, and added a small section  (VI.A.c) for the  
magentic field setting.
I updated caspol.tex, deleted one reaction figure, and modified the  
argument for polarization measurement.

What's missing:
New version of Figure 22, 23, 25 and 28.
New plots: Xi- (or Xi-(1820)) signal+background?

In the experiment part, should we use all new numbers, or should we  
state those were obtained assuming half field, but the overall  
statistics were obtained using the correct setting?

Lei




More information about the Clas12_verystrange mailing list