[Clas12_verystrange] new proposal
Lei Guo
leguo at fiu.edu
Tue Mar 26 20:16:48 EDT 2013
Hi, Guys,
I've made a few changes to the proposal they are in svn now, including
the pdf file.
Authorlist: Added Diane and Will
beam.tex (last section): I changed the projected particle rates. I
used an overall weighted efficiency, replacing what was called overall
efficiency, for Omega and Xi-(1820), based on 80days full field and
30days reversed field, comapred with previous assumption of 80days
half field. The multiplication factor for Omega-(3k) is 0.59, Omega-
(4k) is 0.48, and XI-(1820) is 0.82.
I updated omegaEX.tex, and added a small section (VI.A.c) for the
magentic field setting.
I updated caspol.tex, deleted one reaction figure, and modified the
argument for polarization measurement.
What's missing:
New version of Figure 22, 23, 25 and 28.
New plots: Xi- (or Xi-(1820)) signal+background?
In the experiment part, should we use all new numbers, or should we
state those were obtained assuming half field, but the overall
statistics were obtained using the correct setting?
Lei
More information about the Clas12_verystrange
mailing list