[Clas12_verystrange] new proposal

[Igor Strakovsky]

Hi Lei,

There is no significant difference between PDG10 and PDG12 but it would be 
better to ref PDG12, not PDG10

Cheers, Igor

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:16:48 +0000, Lei Guo <leguo at fiu.edu> wrote:

> Hi, Guys,
> 
> I've made a few changes to the proposal they are in svn now, including  
> the pdf file.
> 
> Authorlist: Added Diane and Will
> beam.tex (last section): I changed the projected particle rates. I  
> used an overall weighted efficiency, replacing what was called overall  
> efficiency, for Omega and Xi-(1820), based on 80days full field and  
> 30days reversed field, comapred with previous assumption of 80days  
> half field. The multiplication factor for Omega-(3k) is 0.59, Omega- 
> (4k) is 0.48, and XI-(1820) is 0.82.
> I updated omegaEX.tex, and added a small section  (VI.A.c) for the  
> magentic field setting.
> I updated caspol.tex, deleted one reaction figure, and modified the  
> argument for polarization measurement.
> 
> What's missing:
> New version of Figure 22, 23, 25 and 28.
> New plots: Xi- (or Xi-(1820)) signal+background?
> 
> In the experiment part, should we use all new numbers, or should we  
> state those were obtained assuming half field, but the overall  
> statistics were obtained using the correct setting?
> 
> Lei
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange

Igor Strakovsky, SAID CNS The George Washington University
Tel: 703-726-8344(NV),202-994-4742(FB),Skype: igors1945_2
Fax: 202-994-3001(FB),Emails: igor at va.gwu.edu, igor at jlab.org