[Clas_cascades] Notes meeting Sep 9

[Zhiwen Zhao]

I had the Lambda(1520) comparison with g11 low energy data set shown in the talk
http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/eg3/wiki/images/0/0c/Zwzhao_Lamda1520_hadron20090612.pdf
They are comparable, but the error bars would be much larger than Delta channel.

Zhiwen

Elton Smith wrote:
> Present: Hovanes, Stepan, Elton, Kijun, Stepan
> On the phone: Ralph, Lewis  <br>
> Notes by Elton.
> 
> == [[Update 8-26 | Normalization studies]] (Lewis) ==
> # Elton and Kijun have sent comments to Lewis. He has incorporated the
> changes. He will work with Ralf this afternnon and have a new draft by
> tomorrow.
> # Ralf mentioned that the untriggered to trigged factor is slightly
> different between the KLambda analyis (4.5) and the same data set of
> ppi+pi- (4.7). For consistentcy one should use the same data set for the
> correction.
> # Elton suggested to include both numbers in the analysis note
> # It would also be good to include a correction with the SAPHIR data.
> # It was agreed that we should include comparisons of eg3 and g11 in the
> triggered range (4.5 - 5 GeV), and the untriggered range (2-4.5 GeV) both
> for the KLambda and the ppi+pi- normalization.
> # Stepan inquired about the Lambda(1520) comparison with g11. Kijun said
> that Haiyun had made that comparison, but quantitatively not very
> sensitive.
> # Stepan mentioned that Brian Mckinnon is doing the Lambda(1520) analysis
> for g10, but has not converged, but this could also be used to check our
> normalization.
> 
> == Next Meeting, Wed Sep 16 ==
> # Feedback on normalization note to Lewis
> 
> Elton Smith
> Jefferson Lab MS 12H5
> 12000 Jefferson Ave
> Suite # 16
> Newport News, VA 23606
> elton at jlab.org
> (757) 269-7625
> (757) 269-6331 fax
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_cascades mailing list
> Clas_cascades at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_cascades