[Clas_cascades] Response to committee

[Elton Smith]

Hi Lewis,

Thanks for the update. I suggest you also reference Table 3 in your
summary. After the sentence "...within 18% agreement." add "Table 3
summarizes the data comparisons for different energy and trigger ranges."

Thanks, Elton.


Elton Smith
Jefferson Lab MS 12H5
12000 Jefferson Ave
Suite # 16
Newport News, VA 23606
elton at jlab.org
(757) 269-7625
(757) 269-6331 fax

On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Lewis Graham wrote:

> Hi Elton,
>
> I made the changes to the note to make those sections consistent with
> the new values in Table 3.  Please check look at the abstract, table and
> summary to make sure I didn't over look anything.  I posted the updated
> copy on the wiki (Aug. 3).  Thanks,
>
> Lewis
>
> Elton Smith wrote:
> > Hi Hovanes and Lewis,
> >
> > I have looked over the response to the committee and only have minor
> > comments:
> >
> > p. 4. (11), second sentence: right parenthesis missing after Fig. 4
> > line 7: "which is strictly is not correct" (remove second 'is').
> >
> > p. 9 (26) refers to Analysis note 2009-106. I have replaced the old
> > analysis note with the version of June 20, which I assume is the latest.
> > But I noticed that the values of uncertainties quoted in the abstract do
> > not match the ones in Table 3. I think these need to be updated. Comments?
> >
> > I have not checked, but the note needs to be updated consistently
> > including abstract, introduction, Table and summary.
> >
> > Thanks, Elton.
> >
> > Elton Smith
> > Jefferson Lab MS 12H5
> > 12000 Jefferson Ave
> > Suite # 16
> > Newport News, VA 23606
> > elton at jlab.org
> > (757) 269-7625
> > (757) 269-6331 fax
> > _______________________________________________
> > Clas_cascades mailing list
> > Clas_cascades at jlab.org
> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_cascades
> >
>