[Clas_hadron] dnp presentation

[Biplab Dey]

My axes definitions are in Fig. 8.1:
http://wwwold.jlab.org/Hall-B/general/thesis/BDey_thesis.pdf
and my definition of the recoil polarization occurs in Eq. 8.31.
I think it's opposite to what you have. That said, I agree, it's 
confusing. Andy Sandorfi has compiled a nice table of the ``more 
commonly'' used conventions, which you might find useful as well:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1108/1108.5411.pdf
All the best, 
-Biplab


On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, cnepali at jlab.org wrote:

>
> I have used \hat{n} = \hat{\gamma} X \hat{\sigma}. Asymmetry of the decay
> proton is taken with respect to this \hat{n}, +ve along \hat{n}. I can
> show you many-many papers that have used this definition (called P_z). Is
> your definition opposite to this? We need to clarify this
>
>
>