[Clas_hadron] Abstract for April APS meeting 2012

[burkert]

Hi Sung,

Perhaps you could make the abstract a bit stronger by not only saying 
that the results are in good agreement with previous CLAS results, but 
what they add beyond that, e.g. more kinematics coverage, higher 
precision, etc.

Another question I have is, why do you analyze a double polarization 
experiments (polarized beam and polarized target) if you only look at 
the beam asymmetry? I would expect that the polarized target adds so 
much background from the carbon in the polarized target, that the error 
bars may not be competitive with the unpolarized target analysis that we 
published from Stephen Strauch's data.  Perhaps you could add a few 
details on the analysis itself.

Volker





On 1/5/12 3:06 PM, Park, Sungkyun wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> I have a plan to submit an abstract for the April APS meeting (2012).
> It is attached with this email and located at the following in JLab
>
> /site/www/html/Hall-B/secure/clas_hadron/abstracts/2012/APS-April12-skpark.pdf
>
> If you have any comments about my abstract, let me know them.
>
> Best Wishes
>
> Sung
> Florida State University
>
>
> This body part will be downloaded on demand.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas_hadron/attachments/20120105/7f5569e0/attachment.html