[Clas_hadron] abstract

[burkert]

Hi Peng,

I have a couple of comments on your nice abstract.

1) The text looks a bit long for a DNP abstract, please check the 
allowed length. If you have to reduce the overall length you could cut 
some of the motivational part, as many abstracts for DNP 2013 are 
submitted to the mini-symposium with similar motivations.
2) You mention the 2-pion production on proton and neutron but you don't 
give the final states that you actually have analyzed.
3) You refer as comparison to the g1c and g9a data that you say are in 
good agreement with your data. While the g1c data have been published in 
PRL, the g9a data have not. You should not use unpublished work to 
demonstrate the consistency of your own analysis.
4) Avoid acronyms like g1c as reference. People from the outside don't 
know what they stand for, just refer to the publication in PRL.

Volker