[Clas_hadron] abstract

[burkert]

Hi Peng,

  Ignore item 1), I thought it was for DNP. Length of abstract is ok for 
MENU.

Volker

   On 6/27/13 7:10 AM, burkert wrote:
> Hi Peng,
>
> I have a couple of comments on your nice abstract.
>
> 1) The text looks a bit long for a DNP abstract, please check the
> allowed length. If you have to reduce the overall length you could cut
> some of the motivational part, as many abstracts for DNP 2013 are
> submitted to the mini-symposium with similar motivations.
> 2) You mention the 2-pion production on proton and neutron but you don't
> give the final states that you actually have analyzed.
> 3) You refer as comparison to the g1c and g9a data that you say are in
> good agreement with your data. While the g1c data have been published in
> PRL, the g9a data have not. You should not use unpublished work to
> demonstrate the consistency of your own analysis.
> 4) Avoid acronyms like g1c as reference. People from the outside don't
> know what they stand for, just refer to the publication in PRL.
>
> Volker
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_hadron mailing list
> Clas_hadron at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron