[clas_members] comment paper for opt-in

[Marco Battaglieri]

Dear Ken,
I agree with Mac: I think that such awkward situation requiresa response 
the Collaboration as a whole.
Appoint the ad-hoc and proceed with the standard op-in/opt-out procedure.
Cheers
Marco

Hicks, Kenneth wrote:
>
> Dear CLAS Collaboration,
>
> Attached is a PDF file with a draft of a comment on the paper that was 
> circulated by M. Amaryan et al., see the preprint at:
>
> http://arXiv.org/abs/1110.3325
>
> For some history, this is the pentaquark analysis presented earlier 
> this year at a CLAS Collaboration meeting, where a vote
>
> was taken about whether to approve this as a CLAS paper. (The vote 
> failed.)
>
> At present, the attached paper is signed by the CLAS Coordinating 
> committee members, plus Elton Smith (chair of the analysis
>
> review committee for the Amaryan et al. analysis).  The intent is to 
> publish the comment paper on the arXiv website.
>
> If you would like to join this paper as a co-author, please send email 
> directly to me (hicks at jlab.org <mailto:hicks at jlab.org>).  (Do NOT 
> reply to this
>
> email unless you have a comment to go to the collaboration as a 
> whole.)  If you want to suggest revisions to this paper,
>
> send your comments to hicks at jlab.org <mailto:hicks at jlab.org>.
>
> The deadline to join the paper is Friday, October 28.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ken Hicks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clas_members mailing list
> clas_members at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_members