[Clascomment] OPT-IN: Upper limits for the photoproduction cross section for the Phi--(1860) pentaquark state off the deuteron

[Hovanes Egiyan]

Hi Dave,

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Bellow we listed our response and
actions we took following your suggestions.

* We believe that this definition of inefficiency is pretty common in the community.

* We added "United Kingdom's Science and Technology Facilities Council" to the Acknowledgements subsection.

* The subscript "t" in?_/t/    in Eq. (4) indicates that this is a variable of which
the left-hand-side is a function. The?  in the denominator is different, it does not show
up in the left-hand-side as an argument because the supremum in the denominator is taken over all three
variables(/e/,/b/,?). That is, we go over all values of these three variable looking for the
value of the/P/  which is the maximal. In the numerator we look for the supremum of/P/
only over two variables(/e/,/b/), and it is dependent on at what?_/t/    we are looking
for the maximal/P/.

Regards,
     Hovanes.


On 07/30/2011 01:11 PM, David Ireland wrote:
> Hi Hovannes et al.,
>
> This is a nice paper. I picked up just a few points:
>
> * p6, left col, para 2: You refer to "inefficiency", which I assume is "1 - efficiency". I'm not sure how clear this concept is to the reader.
>
> * acknowledgements: Please add "United Kingdom's Science and Technology Facilities Council"
>
> * p8, right col, three lines after eq. (4): there is a subscript "t" on \mu in the in-text equation, which is not in the denominator of eq.(4) - is this a typo, or have I misunderstood?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clascomment/attachments/20110731/16ebc1cc/attachment.html