[Clascomment] OPT-IN: A comparison of forward and backward pp pair knockout in 3He(e, e'pp)n
Larry Weinstein
weinstei at jlab.org
Thu Jan 19 11:39:25 EST 2012
Dear Dan,
Thanks for the note. The wrong paper is linked on the opt-in page. It
should point to
http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/e2/weinstei/tensorcorr/PrcForwardBackSrc5.pdf
which is the December 22 version of the paper.
I am cc-ing Ken Hicks so he can fix it.
- Larry
Daniel Carman wrote:
> January 19, 2012
>
>
> Dear Hovhannes and Larry,
>
> I have read through your most recently SRC paper and include my comments below.
> The paper seems to be in good shape so my list is relatively short and includes
> some grammar/style/wording issues that I found in my reading. Let me know if you
> have any questions. Note that the version of the paper that was linked on the
> CLAS review website was dated Aug. 5, 2011.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
>
> ********************************************************************
> General:
> - You are not consistent in this paper with speed of light units c. Either let
> c=1 everywhere or follow consistent notation throughout.
>
> Page 1:
> Abtract.
> Line 3. Use "... experiments by detecting both ...".
> Left column.
> Line 3. "Nucleons in a SRC are comparatively short distances ..." is not a proper
> statement. Please revisit.
>
> Page 2:
> Left column.
> Paragraph 1.
> Line 5. I suggest a clearer notation for omega. How about "$\omega = E_e - E_{e'}$"?
> Line 12. Use "... two nuclei with $p> 0.275~GeV/c$, and is thus ...".
> Paragraph 2.
> Line 2. I suggest "Existing measurements of ...".
> Line 3. Use "... pp)n$ have looked at events where ...".
> Line 9. Use "These measurements are complicated by the strong ...".
> Line 10. What are "continuum-state interactions"?
> Right column.
> Paragraph 4.
> Here you mention that the EC was used for the electron trigger. Was the CC not used in
> this run period for electron triggering as well?
>
> Page 3:
> Left column.
> Fig. 2 caption.
> Line 7. Use "... the data and the straight line ...".
> Right column.
> Fig. 4 caption.
> Line 2. Missing units on p-slow momentum.
> Paragraph 2.
> Line 4. Here you refer to the diagrammatic calculation by Laget. A reference is needed here.
>
> Page 4:
> Left column.
> Paragraph 3.
> Line 1. I suggest "The theoretical cross sections show in this work have been ...".
> Paragraph 4.
> Line 2. Use "... associated with the ...".
> Line 5. Typo on "MEC".
> Line 10. Use "... the third being a spectator.".
> Paragraph 5.
> Line 4. Use "$s$-wave".
> Right column.
> Paragraph 2.
> Line 4. Use "... $s$-wave, which has ...".
> Paragraph 3.
> Line 5. Use "... is emitted backward relative to the momentum transfer, ...".
> Fig. 6 caption.
> Line 2. Remove comma.
> Line 3. Remove comma.
> Line 5. Use "... the data and the histograms ...". (Typo on "histograms".)
>
> Page 5:
> Left column.
> Paragraph 1.
> Line 2. Use "... are emitted forward.".
> Line 6. Use "$\Delta$".
> Line 9. Use "... emitted forward, they have smaller ...".
> Right column.
> Last paragraph.
> Line 1. Use "... the large kinematic coverage of CLAS ...".
>
> Page 6:
> Left column.
> Paragraph 1.
> Line 4 and 6. Use "$\Delta$".
> Line 8. Use "... emitted backwards, each of these interaction effects is much ... becomes more
> sensitive to ...".
> Paragraph 2.
> This begins "This indicates that short range ...". I recommend that this sentence be made part
> of the previous paragraph.
> References.
> Ref. 1 - this is incomplete. Is this a conference proceedings. If so, give the full
> name and the editors.
> Ref. 4 - Update year to 2012.
> Ref. 13 - Should be "B.A. Mecking".
--
Sincerely,
Larry
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lawrence Weinstein
University Professor
Physics Department
Old Dominion University
Norfolk, VA 23529
757 683 5803
757 683 3038 (fax)
weinstein at odu.edu
http://www.lions.odu.edu/~lweinste/
More information about the Clascomment
mailing list