[Clascomment] OPT-IN: Data analysis techniques, differential cross sections and spin density matrix elements for the reaction gamma p -> phi p
Reinhard Schumacher
schumacher at cmu.edu
Wed Feb 19 14:02:38 EST 2014
Hello Biplab,
I read your comments on my comments. Here is a second iteration on those comments, for the points where I still have a question.
Title: I still feel that the present title is still over-playing the fact that you did a lot of work on the analysis methods. Every analysis is a lot of work, and unique in some way. I would remove that first phrase.
line 115: Its far from clear to me why you would let a referee dictate the content of 'your' paper. There is no drawback to mentioning the other paper, and several things to gain.
Eq 11: ah, yes. I see.
line 529: Yes, I see the point, of course. Perhaps you could rephrase the sentence "The dwindling phase space at higher MKK...."
Fig 7: I downloaded the paper again, and again got scrambled figure legends and labels for this and many other figures. (???)
line 1020: Just reread your sentence about a slow rise with energy of both B and C. In Fig 31 B is falling and then flattening, and C is rising only if you ignore the most prominent feature of the distribution. I think you have to qualify your statement.
Fig 36: I still stand by my previous comment, though I could be wrong... The GJ frame is defined in the rest frame of the V, which is what your label indicates. But you show the V as moving and the IP at rest. You want to illustrate a V being created out of the collision of a gamma and the IP, don't you?
Reinhard
More information about the Clascomment
mailing list