[Clascomment] OPT-IN:Longitudinal target-spin asymmetries for deeply virtual Compton scattering

[Silvia Niccolai]

Hello Stepan,
please don't get me wrong, I appreciate and consider your comments 
seriously, and I am doing my best to incorporate everyone's opinion into 
the draft. I understand and accept your suggestions, see here below:

On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Stepan Stepanyan wrote:

> Never the less I want to make my points more clear -
> Yes, you right non of previous papers had "leading twist" in the abstract, 
> but non of
> previous papers defined asymmetry as a "signature" of the interference. In my 
> mind
> in other papers it is more careful wording there, less exclusive statement.

OK, I have now modified the abstract as follows: "For the first time 
target-spin asymmetries for $e\vec{p}\to ep\gamma$ events, which arise 
from the interference of the deeply virtual Compton scattering and the 
Bethe-Heitler processes,...".

> You making quick transition from describing the trigger to the off line cuts 
> without
> telling the "general PRL reader" about it. Two words at the beginning of the 
> sentence
> can fix the problem "In offline analysis, energy cuts on the EC ...".

OK, modified as you suggested.

> At least we could have a sentence or two for large -t/Q2 part of the 
> data/comparison.

OK, I am working on this, will send an updated draft once the 
collaboration review period is over.

Thanks again for your suggestions.
Best regards,
Silvia