[Clascomment] OPT-IN:Longitudinal target-spin asymmetries for deeply virtual Compton scattering

[Stepan Stepanyan]

Thanks Silvia,

By the way I was not complaining and I appreciate all the hard work.

Best, Stepan
On 10/9/14 8:24 AM, Silvia Niccolai wrote:
> Hello Stepan,
> please don't get me wrong, I appreciate and consider your comments 
> seriously, and I am doing my best to incorporate everyone's opinion 
> into the draft. I understand and accept your suggestions, see here below:
>
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Stepan Stepanyan wrote:
>
>> Never the less I want to make my points more clear -
>> Yes, you right non of previous papers had "leading twist" in the 
>> abstract, but non of
>> previous papers defined asymmetry as a "signature" of the 
>> interference. In my mind
>> in other papers it is more careful wording there, less exclusive 
>> statement.
>
> OK, I have now modified the abstract as follows: "For the first time 
> target-spin asymmetries for $e\vec{p}\to ep\gamma$ events, which arise 
> from the interference of the deeply virtual Compton scattering and the 
> Bethe-Heitler processes,...".
>
>> You making quick transition from describing the trigger to the off 
>> line cuts without
>> telling the "general PRL reader" about it. Two words at the beginning 
>> of the sentence
>> can fix the problem "In offline analysis, energy cuts on the EC ...".
>
> OK, modified as you suggested.
>
>> At least we could have a sentence or two for large -t/Q2 part of the 
>> data/comparison.
>
> OK, I am working on this, will send an updated draft once the 
> collaboration review period is over.
>
> Thanks again for your suggestions.
> Best regards,
> Silvia
>