[Clascomment] OPT-IN: Measurement of Unpolarized Cross Sections and Polarized Cross Section Differences for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering

Francois-Xavier Girod fxgirod at jlab.org
Sat Feb 3 18:45:49 EST 2018


Dear Maxime

Can you produce the KM15 fits in a timely manner for this publication? I
can include them in the figures easily if you provide the raw numbers

Please let me know. As far as I can remember, we got in touch with KM but
they did not get back to us.
I personally have no intention of running an executable whose source I
cannot have access to, therefore I am at the moment unable to produce the
KM predictions myself

Best regards
FX

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Maxime Defurne <maxime.defurne at cea.fr>
wrote:

> Dear Authors,
>
> I quickly read the article and it is very likely I will send you more
> comments or questions a bit later.
> Nevertheless I have one main question:
> - Why is there no comparison between your data points and Kresimir
> Kumericki/Dieter Muller fits? The so-called KM15 includes latest results of
> CLAS and Hall A and is in very good agreement with all  data collected so
> far.
>
> Finally, for the Hall A program, can you add the latest paper published in
> Nature Communications about the Rosenbluth separation we did?
>  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-01819-3
> It is the latest published paper with interesting conclusions which, I
> think, is worth being cited. If you think 3 citations for Hall A is too
> much, since the 2015 paper is an update/corrections of the 2006 paper, you
> should remove the 2006 paper and include the Nature communications.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Maxime DEFURNE
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clascomment/attachments/20180203/10bdab83/attachment.html>


More information about the Clascomment mailing list