[d2n-analysis-talk] mwdc 4-pass t0
Brad Sawatzky
brads at jlab.org
Tue May 11 10:09:55 EDT 2010
On Wed, 05 May 2010, posik at jlab.org wrote:
> So I adjusted the t0 for each plane in the mwdc. I then checked the
> residuals for each plane. Before the calibration the residual sigma for
> all planes was between ~600-800 um and now they take on values of
> ~200-300 um. Some planes are better than others. Below I show a plot of
> the v3p planes t0's and residuals before and after the t0 adjustment.
That looks a lot better.
> To get an idea of where we are compared to transversity, I talked to Xin
> and for his elastic runs he had a resolution of 180-200 um and for
> production run he had 200-250um. So we differ only by ~50um.
>
> I am wondering if it is worth doing the calibration wire by wire for the
> t0,wire offsets drift distance to drift time conversion?
I guess the answer to that is given by how this resolution impacts the
momentum resolution (since we will use that to slice the BigBite data up
into bins). Any idea?
-- Brad
--
Brad Sawatzky, PhD <brads at jlab.org> -<>- Jefferson Lab / Hall C / C111
Ph: 757-269-5947 -<>- Fax: 757-269-5235 -<>- Pager: brads-page at jlab.org
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not "Eureka!" but "That's funny..." -- Isaac Asimov
More information about the d2n-analysis-talk
mailing list