[DIRC] Fwd: EIC Detector R&D update
Pawel Nadel-Turonski
turonski at jlab.org
Wed Feb 13 10:14:17 EST 2013
Hello Everyone,
I am forwarding the final report of the committee from the detector R&D.
Unfortunately, it seems that the committee did not look at the proposal
to remind themselves of why high-pT physics, and thus momentum coverage
for PID, is important for the EIC program. It seems that we will have to
make sure to remind them at every opportunity. It was a clear oversight
on my part, but one that should be easy to address. Clearly, the FDIRC
as proposed for the SuperB would not be sufficient to cover the
requirements.
Regarding comprehensive background simulations, I communicated in
private during dinner to our reviewer that Mike Sullivan is trying to
use the SLAC simulation package to set up a synchroton background
simulation that will include all the elements in the ring, not only +/-
X m around the IP, but this effort requires some further work on the
lattice before we have the final results. Since it did not make it into
the report, we will have to be more explicit about these plans in the
proposal update.
The other comments (on page 8), seem to indicate some other minor
misunderstandings - for instance, we never claimed to have done
simulations with SiPMs - but in general seem to be very much in line
with what was presented. We will clearly have to reiterate our plans for
pursuing both a lens-based internal solution and a mirror-based external
one. There are also some more specific questions about timing
resolution, reconstruction algorithms in wide bars, dealing with
multiple hits, and motherboards for the MaPMTs that will require more
specific answers. Perhaps we could try to come up with some of the
answers for our next meeting?
Cheers,
Pawel
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: EIC Detector R&D update
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:27:40 +0000
From: Ludlam, Thomas W <ludlam at bnl.gov>
To: huang at physics.ucla.edu <huang at physics.ucla.edu>, Woody, Craig
<woody at bnl.gov>, Pawel Nadel-Turonski <turonski at jlab.org>, Tanja Horn
<hornt at jlab.org>, dehmelt.sbu at gmail.com <dehmelt.sbu at gmail.com>,
hemmick at skipper.physics.sunysb.edu <hemmick at skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>,
Aschenauer, Elke <elke at bnl.gov>, Bernd Surrow <surrow at temple.edu>,
Sabatie Franck <franck.sabatie at cea.fr>, Ullrich, Thomas S
<ullrich at bnl.gov>, d.dutta at msstate.edu <d.dutta at msstate.edu>, Abhay
Deshpande <abhay.deshpande at stonybrook.edu>, Ullrich, Thomas S
<ullrich at bnl.gov>, Valery Kubarovsky <vpk at jlab.org>, William Brooks
<william.brooks at usm.cl>, Xu, Zhangbu <xzb at bnl.gov>, Ming Shao
<swing at ustc.edu.cn>
CC: Bob McKeown <bmck at jlab.org>, Berndt Mueller <mueller at phy.duke.edu>,
"Lissauer, David" <lissauer at bnl.gov>, Rolf Ent <ent at jlab.org>
Dear EIC Detector R&D PIs,
Attached is the report from the Advisory Committee meeting this past
December. The updates and progress reports presented at the meeting
were extremely helpful. In addition to the Committee's comments on
individual presentations, the report contains some important general
remarks on the program:
* The work on Monte Carlo simulation has reached a level of maturity
and importance at which the Labs and funding agency need to plan
support for a long-term effort of sustained code maintenance and
sharing.
* There is a common interest in GEM technology for tracking and
particle identification, in light of which we need to stay in touch
with advances in the broad community of nuclear and particle physics.
* The Committee emphasizes a continued focus on specific performance
requirements for "golden measurements" at an EIC, with machine and
IR parameters given by the BNL and JLab accelerator groups.
The next meeting of the Advisory Committee is being planned for the May
timeframe. The exact dates will be announced soon. A call for new and
updated proposals to be considered at this meeting has been placed on
the website: https://wiki.bnl.gov/conferences/index.php/EIC_R%25D
<https://wiki.bnl.gov/conferences/index.php/EIC_R%25D>
Please note that the due date for these proposals is April 19, 2013. In
the meantime, progress reports through the quarter ending March 30 from
the on-going projects will be appreciated.
Best regards to all,
Tom Ludlam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dirc/attachments/20130213/995f90d4/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EIC RnD Summary December 13-14 2012 Final.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 493315 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dirc/attachments/20130213/995f90d4/attachment-0001.pdf
More information about the DIRC
mailing list