[Dsg-rich] RICH lifting tool model pictures

Tyler Lemon tlemon at jlab.org
Tue Apr 4 15:24:59 EDT 2017


Hello Tom, 

Attached are three pictures showing the RICH with its lifting tool in an isometric, top, and side view. 

Best regard, 
Tyler 


From: "Marc McMullen" <mcmullen at jlab.org> 
To: "Suresh Chandra" <chandra at jlab.org>, "Rusty Sprouse" <sprouse at jlab.org> 
Cc: "dsg-rich" <dsg-rich at jlab.org>, "Tom" <renzo at jlab.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 11:43:22 AM 
Subject: Re: [Dsg-rich] Fwd: Re: lifting tool for RICH 



Suresh, 

I believe the max load would be 1500Kg (includes the loaded detector and the stiffener), and I think the load test would be 125%. 

Marc 

On 4/4/2017 11:23 AM, Suresh Chandra wrote: 




Marc, 

What is maximum load that the device is to lift & for what load the load test is planned? 


Suresh 

On 4/4/2017 10:07 AM, Marc McMullen wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN


Hi Rusty and Suresh, 

Our collaborators from INFN (Italy) are having an "under the hook lifting device" fabricated here in the US at one of the Jlab procurement approved welder/fab shops. Below is the information I got from the EH&S manual on requirements for a device to be used here at the lab. 


Due to cost, they will probably have the load test done by Hall B Mechanical/Engineering and I have asked them to have the final design reviewed by Bob Miller to make sure that the design passes Jlab standards. 


Is there anything else which would need to be done that I might be overlooking? 

I have attached the .pdf of the preliminary files INFN used for RFQs. 


Regards, 

Marc 


-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: 	Re: [Dsg-rich] lifting tool for RICH 
Date: 	Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:12:10 -0400 
From: 	Marc McMullen <mcmullen at jlab.org> 

To: 	Marco Mirazita <Marco.Mirazita at lnf.infn.it> 

CC: 	dsg-rich <dsg-rich at jlab.org> , Bob Miller <rmiller at jlab.org> 




Marco, 

I am not sure if you are going to wait for any further quotes before going forward with the selection. But, when you ask the vendor to "re-quote" to satisfy your requirements, the vendor will need specific details about information/documentation you need in your final quote (Or they will just send the same quote). 


Doug has provided some information to help us fulfill some of the Jlab requirements for approved use at JLab. In his email, he is referring to specifications that need to be followed by the designer and fabrication shop: 

    * The shop was selected from the Jlab approved fabricators list for welding/brazing. 
    * A qualified Professional Engineer (PE) must approve/design the "Below The Hook Lifting Device" in accordance with ASME B30.20, ASME BTH-1 . 


        * When requesting the requote you should ensure that the fabrication shop meets these criteria 
        * You may want a JLab PE to review the drawing, prior to manufacturing. 


            * Bob may be able to review (If he has not already done it) this if you can provide him with the final drawings (after parts have been converted from metric components to the closest English standard) 
    * 
The fabrication shop must label the device with the following information: 

        * Manufacturer's Name 
        * Manufacturer's Address 
        * Serial Number 
        * Lifter Weight, if over 100lbs (45Kg) 
        * Rated Load 
    * 
We will need to do a load test at Jlab or the shop will have to do it and label it as such. 


        * We should ask the fabrication shop how much this would cost, maybe it is not expensive. 
        * Hall B is qualified to do this test 



I will try to find out if there are other requirements or documentation needed for the stiffener. 

Thanks, 

Marc 









On 3/31/2017 3:07 PM, Douglas Tilles wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Not if it is done by a PE. It will need all the under hook paperwork

Sent from my iPhone 

BQ_BEGIN

On Mar 31, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Marc McMullen <mcmullen at jlab.org> wrote:

Hi Doug,

So far all we have done is contacted fab shops for quotes. We asked Bob for advice on getting a better price, and are following his suggestion, he also suggested having the load test done here at the lab, should CE be contacted prior to manufacturing?

Thanks,

Marc 

BQ_BEGIN

On 3/31/2017 2:08 PM, Douglas Tilles wrote:
I guess you have contacted Civil Eng about a Under Hook Device review and inspection and load testing? 



-- 
Marc McMullen
Detector Support Group
757-269-7738 

BQ_END

BQ_END

-- 
Marc McMullen
Detector Support Group
757-269-7738 

BQ_END


BQ_END

-- 
Marc McMullen
Detector Support Group
757-269-7738 

_______________________________________________ 
Dsg-rich mailing list 
Dsg-rich at jlab.org 
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-rich 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_rich/attachments/20170404/4c9577fb/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: side view - RICH with lifting tool.png
Type: image/png
Size: 73223 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_rich/attachments/20170404/4c9577fb/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: top view - RICH with lifting tool.png
Type: image/png
Size: 93846 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_rich/attachments/20170404/4c9577fb/attachment-0007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: isometric view - RICH with lifting tool.png
Type: image/png
Size: 101488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_rich/attachments/20170404/4c9577fb/attachment-0008.png>


More information about the Dsg-rich mailing list