[Dsg-rich] RICH Box 1 and Box 4 delivery

[Walt Akers]

Still... we can't practically store all of these empty
boxes in the ESB for 6 months.  Can they be disassembled,
stacked and stored in another storage building?  Not only
would that decrease their storage footprint, it would make
it easier for them to be disposed of later and would
eliminate an empty basin that would quickly accumulate
trash.

Walt


Stepan Stepanyan wrote:
> Walt,
>
> My understanding is that if everything will go well with assembly and no problems are found that will require to send things back that boxes can be trashed. So, we need to keep them till fall.
>
> Stepan
>
>> On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Walt Akers <akers at jlab.org> wrote:
>>
>> I received a message from Doug this morning about
>> boxes 2 and 4 being moved to the ESB for storage.
>> Unless we have plans to transport these materials
>> back to INFN within this Fiscal Year, it does not
>> make good fiscal sense to store these boxes, particularly
>> in expensive climate controlled space.
>>
>> Can someone provide a justification for why these
>> empty, wooden boxes need to be kept?
>>
>> Walt
>>
>> Tyler Lemon wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Today, RICH Box 1 and Box 4 are being moved from ESB to EEL in preparation for INFN collaborators' arrival on March 6, 2017. DSG plans to temporarily put Box 1 in either the EEL parking lot or in Target Group's area inside EEL high-bay area. DSG will unpack Box 1 and move contents inside EEL 124 clean room.
>>>
>>> The INFN collaborators want to keep the empty crates for future use. DSG is unable to provide a solution for the storage of the crates. Please discuss this matter within Hall B and let DSG know.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tyler