[dsg-hallb_rich] [EXTERNAL] Re: Name for second RICH sector?

[Marco Mirazita]

I agree with Valery, the names should be connected to the sector.
Is there any "official" convention for other detectors?
Marco


Il 2021-01-13 15:35 Valery Kubarovsky ha scritto:
> Hi All,
> I suggest to connect the RICH name with the sector location. We will
> forget soon who was the first and was the second but sector location
> will stay forever.
> The old RICH is in sector 4. The new one will be in sector 1.
> Best,
> Valery
> 
> -------------------------
> 
> FROM: dsg-hallb_rich <dsg-hallb_rich-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of
> Tyler Lemon <tlemon at jlab.org>
>  SENT: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 9:28:53 AM
>  TO: dsg-hallb_rich at jlab.org <dsg-hallb_rich at jlab.org>
>  SUBJECT: [dsg-hallb_rich] Name for second RICH sector?
> 
>  Hello Marco Mirazita and Marco Contalbrigo,
> 
>  We are starting development of software for the next RICH sector's
> hardware interlock system.
> 
>  Before we get too far in declaring variables for EPICS, what is the
> new RICH sector going to be called?
> 
>  I've seen/heard it called "RICH-II", will this be the official name?
> Should any EPICS variables we have use this designator?
> 
>  -Tyler
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dsg-hallb_rich mailing list
> dsg-hallb_rich at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_rich