[dsg-hallb_rich] [EXTERNAL] Re: d0 tests repeated for mirror 5 and 5C
Marco Mirazita
Marco.Mirazita at lnf.infn.it
Wed Oct 6 06:29:58 EDT 2021
Hi Tyler,
can you put the raw data some where I can get them? I would also like to
have the sequence of your measurements.
Thank you
Marco
Il 2021-10-05 19:36 Tyler Lemon ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> This morning Mindy and I repeated d0 tests for RICH spherical mirror
> 5 and 5C with both mirrors in the horizontal and vertical position
> while testing whether the ambient light background or time CCD is
> active have an effect on the measurement.
>
> Before each set of mirror measurements, we took a new background
> image for use with that set of data.
>
> The first measurement was taken of mirror 5C in the horizontal
> position with the room in the same conditions as the last week's
> measurements.
>
> Next we eliminated as many sources of ambient light as possible,
> repeated the measurement of 5C in horizontal position, then measured
> 5C in the vertical position, switched mirror to measure 5 in the
> vertical position, and finally measured 5 in the horizontal position.
>
> When comparing background images for without and with ambient light
> sources covered, CCD pixel counts were an average of 0.13 +/- 2.39
> counts lower when ambient light was eliminated (histogram in Fig 1).
>
> When comparing the first no-ambient-light background with the last
> no-ambient-light background (~1 hour 15 minutes later), the CCD pixel
> counts for the last background measurement were an average of 0.36 +/-
> 2.38 counts lower (histogram in Fig 2).
>
> From these results, I do not think that leaving the ambient light in
> the room affects the background data too much. However, I do think
> that it is a good idea to take the multiple background measurements
> for each set of measurements.
>
> The table below has the results of the d0 test for each mirror.
>
> Mirror
> Position
> Ambient Light Eliminated?
> Lowest d0 Observed [mm]
> Fit d0 [mm]
> Fit Mirror Radius of Curvature [mm]
>
> 5C
> horizontal
> No
> 1.969
> 2.12
> 2708.1
>
> 5C
> horizontal
> Yes
> 2.008
> 2.16
> 2708.23
>
> 5C
> vertical
> Yes
> 2.989
> 3.01
> 2702.15
>
> 5
> horizontal
> Yes
> 2.468
> 2.81
> 2709.8
>
> 5
> vertical
> Yes
> 2.670
> 2.69
> 2704.26
>
> Because the PDFs of the results are each ~10 MB, I have put them on
> my JLab userweb page at the link below.
>
> https://userweb.jlab.org/~tlemon/RICH/RICHII_mirrors/
>
> -Tyler
> _______________________________________________
> dsg-hallb_rich mailing list
> dsg-hallb_rich at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_rich
More information about the dsg-hallb_rich
mailing list