[Eg6_analysis] [Lowq] DC Calibrations Update

[Stepan Stepanyan]

  Hi Seema,

Comparing your and Lamiaa's lists I would suggest do nothing.
It should be good for this pass0.

Stepan


On 9/8/10 3:24 PM, seema at jlab.org wrote:
> Hi Lamiaa,
> Thanks for your suggestions! I can use the same partition for DC
> calibration constants. But I didn't calibrate run numbers 61535 and 61790.
> So what to do with these two run ranges to start pass0? I can calibrate
> these runs by the end of this week because each run requires 4-5
> iterations. Also could you please submit jobs for these two runs?
> Best regards,
> Seema
>
>> Hi Seema,
>>
>> I have just comment on the run ranges for your DC calibration constants.
>> It
>> is better to use
>> the same partition that I used for the TOF calibration which is:
>>
>> 1. *5.7 GeV : 61107: 60600 - 61215*
>> 2. *1.2 GeV : 61440: 61216 - 61482*
>> 3. *5.7 GeV : 61483 - 61500*: did you check any run of this range before
>> and
>> after applying
>> the new calibration constants of a 61107?
>> 4. 6 GeV  : I noticed that you are not using the calibration constants of
>> the six 6 GeV runs.
>> You have reduced them to just two run ranges instead of six, is there any
>> reason for that?
>>      i.   *61535: 61501 - 61600     *!  I used this run instead of 61540
>> strategic run! It seems that
>>                                                  you have dropped this run
>> from your list
>>      ii.  *61625 : 61601 - 61682*
>>      iii. *61695 : 61683 - 61700 *
>>      iv. *61731 : 61701 - 61777*
>>      v. *61778: 61778 - 61782*
>> 5. 1.2 GeV: *61790: 61783 - 61790*
>> 6. 6 GeV:
>>      vi. *61819: 61791 - 61850*
>>      vii. *61860: 61851 - 61930*
>> 7. 1.2 GeV: *61935: 61931 - 62000*
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Lamiaa
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
>> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM,<seema at jlab.org>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Stepan,
>>> Sorry for my delayed response! I have compiled the results of DC
>>> calibration. Please have a look at the attached file DC_calib.pdf
>>> Although we see many numbers red for superlayer 5 and 6 but we can't get
>>> rid of these. Moreover these numbers are not too far off from the cut
>>> off
>>> value say 310 microns for narrow sigmas in the code. So I think we can
>>> use
>>> these constants for pass0 cooking. I made a list of the runs for
>>> different
>>> energies:
>>> (i) 60707 - 61210 (Ebeam = 5776 MeV)
>>> Constants of run number 61107 which is very well calibrated will be
>>> applied to this run range.
>>> (ii) 61217 - 61481 (Ebeam = 1206 MeV)
>>> Constants of run number 61440 to be copied.
>>> (iii) 61483 - 61496 (Ebeam = 5776 MeV)
>>> Constants of run number 61107 to be copied.
>>> (iv) 61507 - 61782 (Ebeam = 6064MeV)
>>> Constants of run number 61778 to be copied.
>>> (v) 61787 - 61790 (Ebeam = 1269 MeV)
>>> Constants of run number 61935 to be copied.
>>> (vi)61791 - 61930 (Ebaem = 6064 MeV)
>>> Constants of run number 61860 to be copied.
>>> (vii) 61931-61972 (Ebeam = 1269 MeV)
>>> Constants of run number 61935 to be copied.
>>> If it's okay with you, I can go ahead and write these constants to the
>>> appropriate run ranges.
>>> Waiting for your reply,
>>> Best regards,
>>> Seema
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>    Hi Seema,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the files. I only had a chance to look them
>>>> There seem too many red numbers. Do you think they
>>>> can be improved.
>>>> As you know we want to start the next pass0. Can you
>>>> have the best calibration constants for DC in the database
>>>> for cooking.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Stepan
>>>>
>>>> On 9/4/10 3:29 PM, seema at jlab.org wrote:
>>>>> Hello Stepan,
>>>>> Hope that you are having a good weekend :-)
>>>>> I have recalibrated all the nine runs twice during the last two days.
>>>>> The
>>>>> summary sheets are in the directories
>>>>> /work/clas/disk1/seema/dc_calib_test/third_iteration_eps and
>>>>> /work/clas/disk1/seema/dc_calib_test/fourth_iteration_eps.
>>> Unfortunately
>>>>> I
>>>>> am not able to send you these results in a pdf file due to my limited
>>>>> access to the internet because I have just moved into Bloomington!
>>> But I
>>>>> can generate pdf file on Tuesday morning if I don't get access to
>>>>> internet
>>>>> over the weekend! Sorry about that!
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Seema
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Seema,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the update.
>>>>>> Looking forward for the results of next iteration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Stepan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> seema at jlab.org wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello Stepan,
>>>>>>> Sorry for not being in touch with you for the last few days because
>>> I
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> just wrapping up my stuff to come back to US! Also my account was
>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>> locked but I have got access to it now. Regarding DC calibrations I
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> finish the last iteration in the next couple of days and would send
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> email with the latest results. Please let me know if you need any
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> info and I shall be obliged to hear from you!
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Seema
>>>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lowq mailing list
>>> Lowq at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq
>>>