[Eg6_analysis] [Lowq] DC Calibrations Update

Wed Sep 8 17:53:20 EDT 2010

Hi Seema,

Since you are done with your DC calibration. One of us can copy the new
constants to
the Eg6 run index. Please let me know your preference.

Best,

Lamiaa

************************************************************
*  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
*  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
*  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
*  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
*  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
*  Newport News, VA. 23606
************************************************************

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org> wrote:

>  Hi Seema,
>
> Comparing your and Lamiaa's lists I would suggest do nothing.
> It should be good for this pass0.
>
> Stepan
>
>
>
> On 9/8/10 3:24 PM, seema at jlab.org wrote:
>
>> Hi Lamiaa,
>> Thanks for your suggestions! I can use the same partition for DC
>> calibration constants. But I didn't calibrate run numbers 61535 and 61790.
>> So what to do with these two run ranges to start pass0? I can calibrate
>> these runs by the end of this week because each run requires 4-5
>> iterations. Also could you please submit jobs for these two runs?
>> Best regards,
>> Seema
>>
>>  Hi Seema,
>>>
>>> I have just comment on the run ranges for your DC calibration constants.
>>> It
>>> is better to use
>>> the same partition that I used for the TOF calibration which is:
>>>
>>> 1. *5.7 GeV : 61107: 60600 - 61215*
>>> 2. *1.2 GeV : 61440: 61216 - 61482*
>>> 3. *5.7 GeV : 61483 - 61500*: did you check any run of this range before
>>> and
>>> after applying
>>> the new calibration constants of a 61107?
>>> 4. 6 GeV  : I noticed that you are not using the calibration constants of
>>> the six 6 GeV runs.
>>> You have reduced them to just two run ranges instead of six, is there any
>>> reason for that?
>>>     i.   *61535: 61501 - 61600     *!  I used this run instead of 61540
>>> strategic run! It seems that
>>>                                                 you have dropped this run
>>> from your list
>>>     ii.  *61625 : 61601 - 61682*
>>>     iii. *61695 : 61683 - 61700 *
>>>     iv. *61731 : 61701 - 61777*
>>>     v. *61778: 61778 - 61782*
>>> 5. 1.2 GeV: *61790: 61783 - 61790*
>>> 6. 6 GeV:
>>>     vi. *61819: 61791 - 61850*
>>>     vii. *61860: 61851 - 61930*
>>> 7. 1.2 GeV: *61935: 61931 - 62000*
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Lamiaa
>>>
>>> ************************************************************
>>> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
>>> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>>> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>>> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>>> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
>>> ************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM,<seema at jlab.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hello Stepan,
>>>> Sorry for my delayed response! I have compiled the results of DC
>>>> calibration. Please have a look at the attached file DC_calib.pdf
>>>> Although we see many numbers red for superlayer 5 and 6 but we can't get
>>>> rid of these. Moreover these numbers are not too far off from the cut
>>>> off
>>>> value say 310 microns for narrow sigmas in the code. So I think we can
>>>> use
>>>> these constants for pass0 cooking. I made a list of the runs for
>>>> different
>>>> energies:
>>>> (i) 60707 - 61210 (Ebeam = 5776 MeV)
>>>> Constants of run number 61107 which is very well calibrated will be
>>>> applied to this run range.
>>>> (ii) 61217 - 61481 (Ebeam = 1206 MeV)
>>>> Constants of run number 61440 to be copied.
>>>> (iii) 61483 - 61496 (Ebeam = 5776 MeV)
>>>> Constants of run number 61107 to be copied.
>>>> (iv) 61507 - 61782 (Ebeam = 6064MeV)
>>>> Constants of run number 61778 to be copied.
>>>> (v) 61787 - 61790 (Ebeam = 1269 MeV)
>>>> Constants of run number 61935 to be copied.
>>>> (vi)61791 - 61930 (Ebaem = 6064 MeV)
>>>> Constants of run number 61860 to be copied.
>>>> (vii) 61931-61972 (Ebeam = 1269 MeV)
>>>> Constants of run number 61935 to be copied.
>>>> If it's okay with you, I can go ahead and write these constants to the
>>>> appropriate run ranges.
>>>> Waiting for your reply,
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Seema
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Hi Seema,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the files. I only had a chance to look them
>>>>> There seem too many red numbers. Do you think they
>>>>> can be improved.
>>>>> As you know we want to start the next pass0. Can you
>>>>> have the best calibration constants for DC in the database
>>>>> for cooking.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Stepan
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/4/10 3:29 PM, seema at jlab.org wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Stepan,
>>>>>> Hope that you are having a good weekend :-)
>>>>>> I have recalibrated all the nine runs twice during the last two days.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>> summary sheets are in the directories
>>>>>> /work/clas/disk1/seema/dc_calib_test/third_iteration_eps and
>>>>>> /work/clas/disk1/seema/dc_calib_test/fourth_iteration_eps.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately
>>>>
>>>>> I
>>>>>> am not able to send you these results in a pdf file due to my limited
>>>>>> access to the internet because I have just moved into Bloomington!
>>>>>>
>>>>> But I
>>>>
>>>>> can generate pdf file on Tuesday morning if I don't get access to
>>>>>> internet
>>>>>> over the weekend! Sorry about that!
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Seema
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hi Seema,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the update.
>>>>>>> Looking forward for the results of next iteration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards, Stepan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> seema at jlab.org wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello Stepan,
>>>>>>>> Sorry for not being in touch with you for the last few days because
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I
>>>>
>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> just wrapping up my stuff to come back to US! Also my account was
>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>> locked but I have got access to it now. Regarding DC calibrations I
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> finish the last iteration in the next couple of days and would send
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> email with the latest results. Please let me know if you need any
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> info and I shall be obliged to hear from you!
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Seema
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> Lowq mailing list
>>>> Lowq at jlab.org
>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq
>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20100908/44a9c42d/attachment.html 