[Eg6_analysis] draft of my DIS presentation

[Stepan Stepanyan]

Yohann,

Here are some comments from me -
slide #2, first sentence, "There are different GPDs," is not a good phrase.
By now we know how many GPDs are at leading order, may be better to
specify exactly. Continuation in that sentence, I am read it like GPDs have
dependence on spin, chirality ..., since it is not correct consider 
revising.

slide #3, "DVCS is hard electroproduction ..." better to say "DVCS is a 
deeply
virtual electroproduction ..."

slide #4, title of the slide "Bethe Heitler" does not reflect what on 
the slide.
Better to name it "Electroproduction of the real photon" and then you 
describe
both, BH and DVCS.
I did not understand subscript "\lambda" in the formula on \sigma and on I
(interference).
In the last line you may want to write explicitly that \phi-dependence 
of the
asymmetry projects out interference part.

slide #5, figures on the slide are clearly different, but writings are 
the same
and there is no explanations on the slide what are these two figures.

slide #7, write some explanations for figures, people who are not familiar
with CLAS will not understand what in there.

slide #8, add more words explaining detectors. People do not know IC and EC,
use full names. "high angles" -> "large angles", "low angles" -> "small 
angle".

slide #10, write what the reaction is, and what are in the figures.

slide #11, "1% of the AVAILABLE 6 GeV data ARE processed"

Stepan

On 4/8/11 12:12 PM, Yohann Perrin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a draft of my talk at DIS2011 :
> www.jlab.org/~perrin/DIS2011_draft.pdf
>
> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
> Thanks,
> Yohann
> _______________________________________________
> Eg6_analysis mailing list
> Eg6_analysis at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/eg6_analysis