[Eg6_analysis] The up-to-date analysis note and answers to the 1st round comments

[mhattawy@anl.gov]

Dear FX,
    Thank you for clarifying the comment. I cleaned the answer to justify
why I am assuming that this approximation is good within the given
statistics. I attach the new version of the answers to the review
committee.

   We will send the analysis note with the answers today if possible.
Kawtar, can you please submit them, as you have initially created the
request for the note.

For the subtraction, I will start to implement the 4-dimensional
subtraction and present it to the eg6 analysis working group as soon as
possible.

Best regards,
Mohammad Hattawy.



On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org>
wrote:

>
> Dear Mohammad,
>
> Concerning question 35 from reviewer #2 on the two- vs four-dimensional
> subtraction
>
> In section 4.5.1 you actually do not explain *why* you decided to
> integrate the acceptance ratio over 2 dimensions before doing the
> subtraction
> In section 4.4 you mention limited statistics, but I would assume that is
> limited statistics for the data, not for the acceptance ratio
>
> The reviewer's basic point is that :
>  N(ij) = sum(over kl) [Nexp(ijkl) - R(ijkl)NexpPi0(ijkl)]
> is different from :
>  sum(over kl)[Nexp(ijkl)] - [ sum(over kl)NexpPi0(ijkl) ] x [ sum(over
> kl)R(ijkl) ]
>
> [granted, the reviewer did have a typo in the second formula, missing R]
> Note that, this is a mathematical problem which is present even if the
> simulations perfectly reproduce your data, so the current version of your
> answer does not address the reviewer's concern.
>
> How hard would it be for you to do the subtraction first, and the
> integration over two dimensions next ?
>
> Best regards,
> FX
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mohammad Hattawy" <mohammad.hattawy at gmail.com>
> To: "eg6 analysis" <eg6_analysis at jlab.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 2:04:00 PM
> Subject: [Eg6_analysis] The up-to-date analysis note and answers to the
> 1st     round comments
>
> Dear All,
> Here you can find the up-to-date version of the analysis note. As some of
> us requested to identify the big modifications we did in the second
> version, here I list them:
>
> - Chapter 1: pages 13 - 15: a brief introduction about the whole
> experimental setup; CLAS, Solenoid, IC, beam, ..
> - Chapter 2: A. Cleaned the text and corrected some equations modified
> some plots.
> B. Added section 2.4 for the efficiency of the RTPC.
> - Chapter 3: small changes regarding the text and adding some requested
> plots from the reviewers.
> - Chapter 4:
> A. Added section 4.1.3 for some checks to ensure the stability of our
> coherent DVCS results.
> B. Added section 4.5.2 for the accidental contamination.
> C. Section 4.7: the systematic studies were re-performed with additional
> sources are added.
> - Chapter 5: The whole chapter is changed; starting from taking full terms
> of the fitting form to comparing our results to the published free proton
> results.
>
>
> On the other hand, you can find the latest version of the answers to the
> review committee. We had few questions we left to be answered with the
> final results. These are, labeled in red:
> - 1st reviewer: page 25: Q.49 and Q.52
> - 2nd reviewer: page 40: Q.51
> - 3rd reviewer: page 50: Q.21 and Q.22
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Mohammad Hattawy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eg6_analysis mailing list
> Eg6_analysis at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/eg6_analysis
>



-- 
Best regards,
Mohammad Hattawy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20160311/ff81cd72/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mar11_1st_round_comments.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 3663724 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20160311/ff81cd72/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mar11_EG6_analysis_note_v2.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 11062125 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20160311/ff81cd72/attachment-0003.pdf>