[Frost] Brian's NStar writeup V3

[Eugene Pasyuk]

This version looks fine.

-Eugene


On 7/29/11 12:37 , Michael Dugger wrote:
>
> Eugene,
>
> Regarding figure 3:
> If we could print the plots in color, or the plot was less busy, then 
> I think that adding the line at zero would be nice for the reader. 
> However, the contribution is going to be printed in black and white. 
> As it stands now, Brian has three lines on the plot: eta-MAID 
> (dotted); Bonn-Gotchina (dashed), and SAID (solid). I think that 
> adding a line at zero is going to make the plots more difficult to 
> explain and to look at.
>
> I have attached a copy of Brian's plots (figure 3) with the requested 
> line at zero (exciteNew3.gif).
>
> What do you think: Keep the line at zero, or remove it?
>
> Take care,
> Michael
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Eugene Pasyuk wrote:
>
>> Abstract: second occurrence FroST -> FROST
>>
>> Experiment: second line Experimental -> experimental or just drop it,
>> leave simply Hall B.
>> Last paragraph: probably it does not make sense to mention GPID here. It
>> is meaningless for anyone outside of CLAS. For the proceeding it would
>> be sufficient to say that the time-of-flight information and
>> reconstructed momentum were used for particle identification. In that
>> case also drop Ref. 4.
>>
>> Fig 3: add horizontal lines at 0
>>
>> -Eugene
>>
>> On 7/28/11 18:13 , Brian Morrison wrote:
>>> Incorporated the last few changes I received.  If there are no more
>>> changes by tomorrow morning I'll submit it to the speaker's committee.
>>>
>>> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/g9/morrison/NStar2011_MorrisonV3.pdf
>>>
>>> -Brian
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Frost mailing list
>>> Frost at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
>> _______________________________________________
>> Frost mailing list
>> Frost at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
>>