[Frost] FROST pass0_v5

[Eugene Pasyuk]

It looks much better than previous pass.
ST needs some more tuning. Particularly run ranges 62200-62340, 
62800-63000, 63150-63290
EC needs overall offset adjustment for the very beginning and very end 
of the run, also few individual runs in some places.
DC seems consistent over entire period.
Tagger looks fine.
SC needs fine tuning of overall tag2tof offset.

To all calibrators: please, check all those monitoring plots for you 
detector and make adjustments when needed.
We also need to enter beam position to the calibration database. I will 
do this.

-Eugene

On 8/6/12 9:58 , natalie at jlab.org wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry for the unbelievably long delay, but I was on vacation for a few
> weeks and the farm was incredibly slow anyways. However, pass0_v5 is
> finally finished (!!!) and looks quite nice. Please take a look at the
> monitoring pages.
>
> http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g9/monitor/monitorwrapper.html
>
> Please compare to pass0_v4, it looks much better.
>
> Also, please take a look at individual runs as well. This time, I used
> extension file A11 to check the quality of calibrations, especially
> tagger, since it usually drifts during an individual run. To compare
> results to pass0_v4, you should use extension file A07.
>
> http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g9/anamon/monitorwrapper.html
>
> I hope that there will not be much more to fix and the final pass can be
> done soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Natalie
>
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost