[Frost] Double-Pion Photoproduction abstract for DNP 2013 meeting

[Eugene Pasyuk]

I agree, to make titles of the two contributions distinct it make sense to specify in the title exact observables which will be shown in each of them. Otherwise both abstracts look good.

-Eugene

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Volker Crede" <crede at fsu.edu>
> To: "Steffen Strauch" <strauch at sc.edu>
> Cc: "frost FROST" <frost at jlab.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 4:35:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Frost] Double-Pion Photoproduction abstract for DNP 2013        meeting
> 
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> I agree with Bill. Just a minor thing: Since there will be a related
> talk from FSU including Sungkyun's results, it might be good to add
> the indices to the double-polarization observables.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
>        Volker
> 
> 
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Steffen Strauch <strauch at sc.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Colleagues,
> > 
> > V. Mokeev is organizing the "Mini-Symposium on Advances in the
> > Exploration of the Excited Nucleon State Spectrum and Structure"
> > at the upcoming DNP meeting in Newport News.  He asked me if I
> > could report on our double-pion work in a 10+5 min presentation.
> > The presentation will include Yuqing's g9a data.  We might have
> > some preliminary results from Aneta's g9b analysis also.  I would
> > appreciate if you have any comments or suggestions to the attached
> > abstract.  I plan to submit it by the end of the week.
> > 
> > Many thanks and all the best,
> > Steffen
> > 
> > <dnp2013_abstract.pdf>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Frost mailing list
> > Frost at jlab.org
> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
>