[Frost] [EXTERNAL] Re: Brief history of the FROST pi0 E-observable

[Eugene Pasyuk]

A gentle reminder. Please go to the doodle poll https://doodle.com/poll/kenwavmxp5yfxgw5 and vote if you had not done it yet.

-Eugene

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frost <frost-bounces at jlab.org> On Behalf Of Stuart Fegan
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 11:58
> To: frost at jlab.org
> Subject: [Frost] [EXTERNAL] Re: Brief history of the FROST pi0 E-observable
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Thanks for taking the time and trouble to remind us all of the timeline of the
> pi0 E analysis.  As you probably found in your digital archaeology project, very
> little write-up exists of the old GW analyses beyond Hideko's thesis, and
> even less in the way of code.  Chan's had to start over to some extent, which
> has been a bit frustrating for him, but I think now we're planning to have
> more regular FROST meetings, we can show what he's achieved so far, clear
> up some of the issues he's having, and keep him on track.
> 
> Thanks again to yourself, and the rest of the FROST group, for maintaining an
> interest in this after all these years, we appreciate it.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Stuart
> 
> On 11/11/2019 10:59, Michael Dugger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was doing some archeology on the FROST wiki searching for pi0 E
> > information. This is a brief history:
> >
> > People working on the pi0 E-observable using FROST data:
> >
> > * Hideko from GW did her dissertation on the measurement but the
> > results were not of publishable quality
> >
> > * Mike Dugger from ASU worked on the analysis for some time. A
> > comparison between Hideko and my stuff can be found in an April 2012
> > FROST presentation that can be found at
> > https://userweb.jlab.org/~dugger/frost/pi0Ev1.pdf
> >
> > * The analysis went back to GW. In November of 2013 I gave all my
> > analysis software to Diane Schott. A 2015 update on that analysis can
> > be found at
> > https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g9/wiki/index.php/Diane%27s_analysi
> > s_page
> >
> > * 2019 Chan Kim has taken over the pi0 analysis for the E-observable.
> >
> > It looks like the newest 2019 GW results are in serious disagreement
> > with previous FROST efforts. This is confusing since GW has a long
> > history with this reaction. It is almost as if there is absolutely
> > zero memory of this effort within the GW group.
> >
> > Take care,
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Frost mailing list
> > Frost at jlab.org
> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
> 
> --
> Dr Stuart Fegan
> Honorary Research Associate
> Nuclear Physics Group
> University of Glasgow
> (Currently at George Washington University)
> 
> E-mail: s.fegan.glasgow at gmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost