[Frost] [EXTERNAL] Re: Brief history of the FROST pi0 E-observable

[Eugene Pasyuk]

I checked the poll. It looks like the best option is Wednesday 11:00 JLab time. It fits everyone who voted except Nick. So, let's fix it for next Wednesday. I'll set up bluejeans meeting.

-Eugene

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eugene Pasyuk
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 13:19
> To: frost at jlab.org
> Subject: RE: [Frost] [EXTERNAL] Re: Brief history of the FROST pi0 E-
> observable
> 
> A gentle reminder. Please go to the doodle poll
> https://doodle.com/poll/kenwavmxp5yfxgw5 and vote if you had not done
> it yet.
> 
> -Eugene
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Frost <frost-bounces at jlab.org> On Behalf Of Stuart Fegan
> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 11:58
> > To: frost at jlab.org
> > Subject: [Frost] [EXTERNAL] Re: Brief history of the FROST pi0
> > E-observable
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time and trouble to remind us all of the
> > timeline of the
> > pi0 E analysis.  As you probably found in your digital archaeology
> > project, very little write-up exists of the old GW analyses beyond
> > Hideko's thesis, and even less in the way of code.  Chan's had to
> > start over to some extent, which has been a bit frustrating for him,
> > but I think now we're planning to have more regular FROST meetings, we
> > can show what he's achieved so far, clear up some of the issues he's
> having, and keep him on track.
> >
> > Thanks again to yourself, and the rest of the FROST group, for
> > maintaining an interest in this after all these years, we appreciate it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> > On 11/11/2019 10:59, Michael Dugger wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was doing some archeology on the FROST wiki searching for pi0 E
> > > information. This is a brief history:
> > >
> > > People working on the pi0 E-observable using FROST data:
> > >
> > > * Hideko from GW did her dissertation on the measurement but the
> > > results were not of publishable quality
> > >
> > > * Mike Dugger from ASU worked on the analysis for some time. A
> > > comparison between Hideko and my stuff can be found in an April 2012
> > > FROST presentation that can be found at
> > > https://userweb.jlab.org/~dugger/frost/pi0Ev1.pdf
> > >
> > > * The analysis went back to GW. In November of 2013 I gave all my
> > > analysis software to Diane Schott. A 2015 update on that analysis
> > > can be found at
> > > https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g9/wiki/index.php/Diane%27s_analy
> > > si
> > > s_page
> > >
> > > * 2019 Chan Kim has taken over the pi0 analysis for the E-observable.
> > >
> > > It looks like the newest 2019 GW results are in serious disagreement
> > > with previous FROST efforts. This is confusing since GW has a long
> > > history with this reaction. It is almost as if there is absolutely
> > > zero memory of this effort within the GW group.
> > >
> > > Take care,
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Frost mailing list
> > > Frost at jlab.org
> > > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
> >
> > --
> > Dr Stuart Fegan
> > Honorary Research Associate
> > Nuclear Physics Group
> > University of Glasgow
> > (Currently at George Washington University)
> >
> > E-mail: s.fegan.glasgow at gmail.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Frost mailing list
> > Frost at jlab.org
> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost