[G12] EC Dimensions
Michael C. Kunkel
mkunkel at jlab.org
Wed Dec 11 16:36:58 EST 2013
Greetings,
Thank you Ken, this is what I believed.
I have talked with Moskov, who is first author of the EC NIM, and he
stated that the EC geometry is symmetric in U,V, and W. Therefore the
study in which Ibrahim presented has flaws and should be worked out.
BR
MK
On 12/11/13 6:57 PM, Hicks, Kenneth wrote:
> MK,
>
> For the EC, I believe the planes were all symmetric. For the PCAL (i.e. CLAS12), the planes are asymmetric, but that doesn't affect g12.
>
> Ken
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: g12-bounces at jlab.org [mailto:g12-bounces at jlab.org] On Behalf Of Michael C. Kunkel
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 12:45 PM
> To: g12
> Subject: [G12] EC Dimensions
>
> Greetings G12,
>
> From last meeting, it was speculated by Ibrahim that the U, V, and W layers of the EC were asymmetric. See page 2 of https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g7/wiki/images/3/36/Iha_EC_study.pdf
>
> However after reading the NIM on the EC, the wording suggests that each U,V, and W plane were made identical.
>
> Could someone please clear this issue? The reason it needs to be cleared is to properly program EC knockouts from dead strips.
>
> Thanks
> MK
> _______________________________________________
> G12 mailing list
> G12 at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12
More information about the G12
mailing list