[G12] EVNT bank

[Michael C. Kunkel]

Greetings,

To my recollection, and hopefully Dennis can remember as well since we 
look at this together in a G12 meeting, the problem with the EVNT bank 
was that there were some events where EVNT was reporting more tracks 
than PART. When we (Dennis and I) went back to the original uncooked 
files, we discovered that the extra events that EVNT was reporting had 
no tracks in the DC. We used CCD to verify this with a small data sample 
and concluded that this effect was throughout the EVNT. This conclusion 
makes the EVNT unusable due to the fact when we cook with a1c we do not 
store the DC information and we have no way of knowing which events have 
this no DC effect.

I know that there are some people that use EVNT, and I have questioned 
this numerous times. I would suggest that people using EVNT to 
independently verify that what I have stated is correct. Sorry to be the 
bearer of bad news.

Also, for those interested, I am attaching my ffread card. For those 
using CC and EC in your simulation, set your clas_caldb
setenv CLAS_CALDB_RUNINDEX calib_user.RunIndexg12_mk
I believe that the normal CLAS_CALDB_RUNINDEX calib_user might work, but 
I have never verified.


BR
MK

-------------- next part --------------
=============FFREAD.G12======================
CUTS   5.e-3 5.e-3 5.e-3 5.e-3 5.e-3
CCCUTS 1.e-3 1.e-3 1.e-3 1.e-3 1.e-3
DCCUTS 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4
ECCUTS 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4
SCCUTS 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4 1.e-4

UPSTPOS 0. 0. 0.
MAGTYPE 2
MAGSCALE 0.500 0.000
PTGIFIELD 0
STTYPE 1
STZOFF -90.0
TGPOS 0. 0. 0.
TARGET 'g11a'
TGMATE 'PROT'
POSBEAM 0.0 0.0
GEOM 'ALL' 'ST'
NOGEOM 'MINI' 'PTG'
BEAM00 5.714
DCAY 1
PAIR 1
HADR 1
MULS 1
KINE 1
AUTO 1
RUNG 10
TRIG 200000
STOP
============================================