[G12] EVNT bank

[Haiyun Lu]

The tracks with non-positive status in EVNT bank should be thrown away. 
After this, there is no big difference between EVNT and PART bank as to 
my knowledge.

On 09/11/2013 12:11 PM, Michael C. Kunkel wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> To my recollection, and hopefully Dennis can remember as well since we 
> look at this together in a G12 meeting, the problem with the EVNT bank 
> was that there were some events where EVNT was reporting more tracks 
> than PART. When we (Dennis and I) went back to the original uncooked 
> files, we discovered that the extra events that EVNT was reporting had 
> no tracks in the DC. We used CCD to verify this with a small data 
> sample and concluded that this effect was throughout the EVNT. This 
> conclusion makes the EVNT unusable due to the fact when we cook with 
> a1c we do not store the DC information and we have no way of knowing 
> which events have this no DC effect.
>
> I know that there are some people that use EVNT, and I have questioned 
> this numerous times. I would suggest that people using EVNT to 
> independently verify that what I have stated is correct. Sorry to be 
> the bearer of bad news.
>
> Also, for those interested, I am attaching my ffread card. For those 
> using CC and EC in your simulation, set your clas_caldb
> setenv CLAS_CALDB_RUNINDEX calib_user.RunIndexg12_mk
> I believe that the normal CLAS_CALDB_RUNINDEX calib_user might work, 
> but I have never verified.
>
>
> BR
> MK
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> G12 mailing list
> G12 at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/g12/attachments/20130911/637c08ba/attachment.html