[G12] g12 run group review committee

[Carlos Salgado]

Hello everybody

Let's discuss this issue in today's g12 meeting!

-Carlos

On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Marco Battaglieri wrote:

> Dear g12 spokespersons and g12 run group members,
> as you well know g12 members  are in the process of producing some analysis notes (as well as phd thesis) reporting results based on g12 data. Since g12 is acting coherently discussing progress in weekly meeting and ti is well organized, rather than scrutinize each individual note, I would prefer to have a single review of the all basic steps common to the different analysis. This includes: trigger issues, normalization, particle identification,  calibration, cooking, corrections, fiducial cuts ...
> 
> For this purpose I set up a review committee in charge of review the whole g12 run group.
> Members of the review committee (Eugene Pasyuk - chairman-, Raffaella De Vita, Mike Dugger, Yordanka Ilieva)  have been chosen according their (high level) competences and experience in photoproduction runs. Since this is the first time we are setting up such a procedure, the full set of rules will be decided along the path under the supervision of the HSWG  chairman and the CLAS Coordinating Committee.
> 
> I'm expecting that g12 run group will provide  full support and collaboration to the review, nominating one or two representatives that will collect the documentation and will interact with the review committee.
> Once the review will be over, all the analyses based on the approved framework will have a fast track for the further review steps that will only process the physics output and the details of the specific analysis (not included in the general framework).
> 
> This can be considered a sort of a test for the future of CLAS12 where we hope to have a single review that will check basic things leaving to review committees to review the physics results and the high-level analysis procedures.
> 
> I would ask the g12 experiment spokesperson, with the help of the whole run group, to provide:
> - a list of the analysis based on g12 data set (including phd thesis) indicating the status: active, sleeping, dead
> - one or preferably two representatives in charge of interacting with the committee.
> The review committee will establish a list of items that will be scrutinized and will have to be documented by the g12 rungroup.
> 
> The next Collaboration meeting will be a good time to have a public discussion on this initiative therefore, I would like to start this process immediately, collecting your input by November 1st.
> Let me know if you have any suggestions and or comments that we may incorporate in the Committee charge and/or to the review procedure.
> Thanks in advance
> Marco
>