[G12] Fwd: g12 review
Johann Goetz
goetz at jlab.org
Tue Jun 30 13:52:01 EDT 2015
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org>
Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:09 AM
Subject: g12 review
To: Marco Battaglieri <battaglieri at ge.infn.it>, Keith Griffioen <
griff at physics.wm.edu>, Dave Ireland <david.ireland at glasgow.ac.uk>, Gerald
Gilfoyle <gilfoyle at jlab.org>
Cc: Raffaella De Vita <raffaella.devita at ge.infn.it>, Michael Dugger <
dugger at jlab.org>, Yordanka Ilieva <jordanka at jlab.org>, Lei Guo <
lguo at jlab.org>, Silvia Niccolai <niccolai at ipno.in2p3.fr>, Johann Goetz <
theodore.goetz at gmail.com>
Dear all,
It was brought to my attention that while we are working on the g12 run
group review there is another g12 analysis review ongoing in the deep
process working group. This is time-like Compton scattering.
https://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/shifts/index.php?display=admin&task=paper_review&rid=6996371&operation=view
This review has started in April of 2015 while the group review has started
in October 2014.
Interestingly enough this analysis note has twice as many pages as the
group one.
To me it looks like a lack of coordination and communication between the
physics working groups and even within g12 group.
The whole point of the group review was to avoid duplication of efforts in
reviewing the same things over and over.
Can anyone comment why did this happen and what are we going to do about it.
Thanks,
-Eugene
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/g12/attachments/20150630/d44f6c1f/attachment.html>
More information about the G12
mailing list