[G12] g12 triggers

Andrea Celentano andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it
Mon Feb 18 12:29:41 EST 2019


Hi Ben,
thanks. I see in the output banks there is a RC26 bank, containing data from the crate where the TS was. 

However, don’t know if output data from this bank contains this information. I print here what I get from HEAD, TGBI, RC26 banks from one event:

Group:  HEAD    Sector: 0       Nhits:  1       Next ind:       0

Version:        0
Run:            56541
Event:          2969
Type:           1  (physics data)
ROC:            0
CLASS:          14
Trgbit:         0x5018
TIME:           Thu May 21 18:02:01 2144


Group:  RC26    Sector: 0       Nhits:  4       Next ind:       0
Trigger Pattern: 18  Gated Scaler: 52929  Ungated Scaler: 171067
Trigger Pattern: 0  Gated Scaler: 2  Ungated Scaler: 53
Trigger Pattern: 20304344  Gated Scaler: 1  Ungated Scaler: 1175
Trigger Pattern: 35  Gated Scaler: 358096021  Ungated Scaler: 230760015

Group:  TGBI    Sector: 0       Nhits:  1       Next ind:       0
latch1: 5018  helicity_scaler: 90  interrupt_time: 3055511  latch2: 0

It looks that RC26 first entry (18) is then reported in the TGPI latch1, that in turns is put in Head (this is true for all events). I don’t know about other entries in RC26.

Bests,

Andrea

> On Feb 18, 2019, at 18:24, Benjamin Raydo <braydo at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> I talked with Ed to confirm: if the L1 bit is disabled at the TS then the trigger word pattern in the event will have 0's for those bits. He mentioned there is a TS register that could be read to get the trigger bit pattern regardless of enabled/disabled, but it would have had to been read and written in the event (so there's a good chance you don't have this - maybe Sergey recalls differently and can let you know).
> 
> Ben
> From: Andrea Celentano <andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it>
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 11:07:14 AM
> To: Benjamin Raydo
> Cc: g12; Sergey Boyarinov
> Subject: Re: g12 triggers
>  
> Hi Ben,
> thanks! Concerning this bit 8, in the file:
> 
> /usr/clas/parms/trigger/config/g12/g12_LUT_L2_102212.cfg (that should be the “good” one used in g12), in line 145 I see that bit8 (at level1) was disabled. All the others were enabled.
> 
> Concerning the single sector, in the file:
> 
> /usr/clas/parms/trigger/config/g12/g12_LUT_single_sector.cfg
> 
> in the line 144 I see that bits 7,8,9 were disabled.
> 
> Therefore, maybe what I see in the data files is ok (unless disabled means that they’re still reported in the output bank but not enabled to trigger readout).
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> Andrea
> 
>> On Feb 18, 2019, at 17:03, Benjamin Raydo <braydo at jlab.org <mailto:braydo at jlab.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Andrea,
>> 
>> I'll have a chance to look at this with Sergey & Valery this week. I have some guesses, but need to dig into more details to refresh my memory on this first.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>> From: Andrea Celentano <andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it <mailto:andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it>>
>> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 10:46:04 AM
>> To: g12
>> Cc: Sergey Boyarinov; Benjamin Raydo
>> Subject: Re: g12 triggers
>>  
>> Dear g12,
>> had anyone any change to look at this? Furthermore, I see other inconsistencies in the g12 trig table (table 3 in the note). For example, I never see trigger bit 8, that a part from L2, should be the same as trigger bit 1.
>> I see this effect also in MK thesis (fig. 93 pag 140) - trigger bit 2 is ON for some events, while trigger bit 8 is always OFF.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Andrea
>> 
>>> On Feb 14, 2019, at 16:49, Andrea Celentano <andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it <mailto:andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear g12,
>>> I am looking at the trigger efficiency of trigger bit #5 (STxTOF x (ECPx2)). 
>>> 
>>> Before doing so, I wanted to do some checks on the way trigger bits were reported in the output banks. 
>>> I have taken from tape a single file from run 56541 (file A00), and I opened it via bosdump, printing HEAD, TGBI and RC26 banks.
>>> 
>>> According to g12 note (table 2 pag. 5), for this run trigger bits 1..6 are MORA x (STxTOF)_i x (STxTOF), without any prescale and without L2.
>>> Trigger bit 8 is MORA x (STxTOF)x2.
>>> 
>>> Therefore, for any event with one of trigger bits 1..6 set, trigger bit 8 should also be present (for example, if trigger bit 1 is set, it means that MORA is TRUE, and that there are two sectors with STxTOF, one of which is sector #1: trigger bit 8 is also satisfied for this event).
>>> 
>>> However, this is not the case for the events I am scrutinizing. I report to you some events showing this issue. I also CC this to Sergey and Ben, so that they can provide further input to the discussion.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> EVENT:
>>> Version:        0
>>> Run:            56541
>>> Event:          858
>>> Type:           1  (physics data)
>>> ROC:            0
>>> CLASS:          14
>>> Trgbit:         0x5405        --> bit 1, bit 3, bit 11, bit 13, bit 15. By the way, what are trigger bit 13 and 15? They are not reported in table 2.
>>> TIME:           Thu May 21 18:02:01 2144
>>> 
>>> EVENT:
>>> Version:        0
>>> Run:            56541
>>> Event:          853
>>> Type:           1  (physics data)
>>> ROC:            0
>>> CLASS:          14
>>> Trgbit:         0x8c20     --> bit 6, bit 11, bit 12, bit 16. By the way, what is trigger bit 16? This is not reported in table 2.
>>> TIME:           Thu May 21 18:02:01 2144
>>> 
>>> EVENT:
>>> Version:        0
>>> Run:            56541
>>> Event:          947
>>> Type:           1  (physics data)
>>> ROC:            0
>>> CLASS:          14
>>> Trgbit:         0x5c15  --> bit 1, bit 3, bit 5, bit 11, bit 12, bit 13, bit 15. By the way, what is trigger bit 15? This is not reported in table 2.
>>> TIME:           Thu May 21 18:02:01 2144
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrea

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/g12/attachments/20190218/5a59913f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the G12 mailing list