[G8b_run] g8b Cooking

[David Ireland]

Hi Franz,

May I also add my thanks to you for carrying out this lengthy task. I am 
sure all the g8 analyses will benefit from the recooking.

Cheers,

Dave






On 06/09/2013 16:45, Franz Klein wrote:
> Volker,
>
> I apologize that the re-cooking has been delayed for weeks (months). I
> really hoped that I could focus more on g8b than g9 & g14 but ...
>
> After fixing the 2/3 nsec timing offset in PART,GPID (correction for
> target center), I ran 2-3 files per run to check calibrations, in
> particular TAG,TOF,EC (which had a common offset).
>
> Mid of August I wanted to start with the "big cooking" but didn't have a
> solution for Mike's paw ntuple maker and had too many banks (I removed
> some raw banks (TAGE,TGTL,TGTR), all intermediate and scaler banks and
> added DHCL,RGLK for DC hist cluster and region 1 fit info ... can help
> to identify track segments where the DC had larger holes).
>
> I think everything is working now and Mike checked the newest CentOS6
> output for paw ntuples (previously his code worked only on Redhat5,
> which meant I had to save BOS files on volatile and run a script on
> ifarm1101 after the farm job was done) ...
>
> The later 1.7GeV data are almost done (48528-48644), over the weekend
> I'll do the 1.3GeV data (48208-48329) and start with the later 1.5GeV
> runs (48413-48509). Please note that I skipped a few runs where I need
> more time to get the tagger offsets right.
> Most autoswap runs and 2.1 GeV runs need additional tweaking of tagger
> offsets (for autoswap I will skip bad trip intervals including swapping
> time).
>
> Note to Mike: please wait with copying PAW/NTgpid files. I have not
> checked the consistency of the files from last night.
>
> That's it for now!
> If you have any questions or concerns, please tell me!
>
> Franz
>
> On 09/06/2013 10:09 AM, Volker Crede wrote:
>> Hi Franz,
>>
>> I just noticed that the directory /mss/clas/g8b/production/pass1/v3/BOS at JLab is slowly filling up. Is this part of the "big cooking" or would you consider these files still preliminary for calibration purposes? Do you suggest that we start analyzing these files?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>           Volker
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>