[Gpdtc] Wednesday....

[David Richards]

Hi All,

Before I go too far down writing something for Wednesday, please find attached some first thoughts - without figures.


The first couple of slides are basically some observations about the call, and what are likely to be the criteria (NB I could have also included diversity in all its interpretations…).
The real issue is how much should we discuss about our discussions and aims in the context of this meeting (transparency 5), and should I say (verbally or on paper) who is currently in our discussions (page 6) - I’ve listed institutions + (incomplete) names.  I make the point on page 3 that the creation of long-term positions is an important task, but I’m not sure I would want to say in writing where those positions might be.

I’ve taken the Executive Summary document, and page 5 is basically the extraction of that.  But we had some discussion before the break as to what the focus should be - for example, purely to extract GPDs, or aim to learn something more about the internal dynamics of hadrons (ie as Christian was discussing).  Similarly, Global Fitting or are there some better words we can use?


Regards,
David


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/gpdtc/attachments/20220110/d8269928/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TownHall.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 287797 bytes
Desc: TownHall.pdf
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/gpdtc/attachments/20220110/d8269928/attachment-0001.pdf>