[Gpdtc] Committee....

[Jianwei Qiu]

Dear All,

Sorry for my late response.  I was traveling to DC area last night to spend the weekend with my family.  I agree that Ian, Martha, Christian and David are good choice to represent our effort.

I also agree with what David said in his email to Xiangdong and Feng.  At this stage, it is important to communicate to identify the focused and achievable goals and milestones within 5 years with a good story line for the proposal, and exam what each side can bring to the table to achieve that, which might help to converge.

Best,

Jianwei
________________________________
From: Gpdtc <gpdtc-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of David Richards <dgr at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 6:16 PM
To: gpdtc at jlab.org <gpdtc at jlab.org>
Subject: [Gpdtc] Committee....

Hi All,

Just to sound everyone out - I was going to suggest Ian and Martha, and indeed Martha has already agreed since she has already an established record on GPDs.  I think it important to make emphasize this is not a Jlab-centric effort but broader.  I should add that I haven’t emailed any names to Xiangdong and Feng yet, merely that we need to confirm their willingness first given the efforts that will be involved.

Any other thoughts? Christian (who has led these efforts before)?  If there are four, I would also propose that I join simply because I’ve been most directly in contact with Xiangdong, rather than as a lattice expert.

Regards,
David



_______________________________________________
Gpdtc mailing list
Gpdtc at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/gpdtc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/gpdtc/attachments/20220115/bdbf125f/attachment.html>