[Halld-cpp] CPP REST production

[Alexander Austregesilo]

Hi Igal,

This failure rate is pretty bad. Can you point me to the log files of 
the failed jobs? The messages you sent concerning root dictionaries and 
ps_counts_thresholds are not fatal, they will not cause a failures. You 
should still confirm with Sasha if the ps_counts_thresholds are important.


The file /work/halld/home/gxproj4/public/ForAlexAndSean/std.out seems to 
be cut off. We may want to add this option to the config file to remove 
the number of processed events:


JANA:BATCH_MODE 1


You can find my output files here: 
/work/halld2/home/aaustreg/Analysis/cpp/REST/

I don't have the logs, but all files were closed at exactly the same time.


Cheers,

Alex




On 6/26/24 08:59, Igal Jaegle wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Could you provide the path to your output files and most importantly 
> the logs?
>
> The results of the test on NERSC for the same run are as follows
>
> 108 evio files were cooked properly out of 126, thus 15% failure rate 
> which is way too much to proceed with the cooking.
>
> tks ig.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Alexander Austregesilo <aaustreg at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2024 6:06 PM
> *To:* halld-cpp at jlab.org <halld-cpp at jlab.org>
> *Cc:* Naomi Jarvis <nsj at cmu.edu>; Igal Jaegle <ijaegle at jlab.org>; Sean 
> Dobbs <sdobbs at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* CPP REST production
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I processed one single file of a typical CPP production run on Pb
> target. Here is a list of all files and their sizes which will be
> produced suring the REST prodution:
>
> 1.7G hd_rawdata_101586_000.ps.evio
> 1.2G dana_rest.hddm
> 495M hd_rawdata_101586_000.ctof.evio
> 160M hd_rawdata_101586_000.cpp_2c.evio
> 115M hd_rawdata_101586_000.random.evio
>   93M tree_PSFlux.root
>   90M hd_rawdata_101586_000.npp_2pi0.evio
>   72M hd_rawdata_101586_000.npp_2g.evio
>   49M tree_TPOL.root
>   42M converted_random.hddm
>   41M hd_root.root
>   16M hd_rawdata_101586_000.FCAL-LED.evio
>   13M hd_rawdata_101586_000.BCAL-LED.evio
> 1.1M tree_tof_eff.root
> 164K tree_fcal_hadronic_eff.root
> 105K hd_rawdata_101586_000.DIRC-LED.evio
> 105K hd_rawdata_101586_000.CCAL-LED.evio
>   94K hd_rawdata_101586_000.sync.evio
>   24K tree_TS_scaler.root
>   24K tree_bcal_hadronic_eff.root
>   24K syncskim.root
>
> The trigger skims for ps (with thick converter) and ctof are quite
> large. Do we actually need them or were they maybe already produced
> during the calibration stages?
>
> As far as I understand, Igal has started a test of the REST production
> at NERSC. We are getting closer to launch!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Alexander Austregesilo
>
> Staff Scientist - Experimental Nuclear Physics
> Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
> Newport News, VA
> aaustreg at jlab.org
> (757) 269-6982
>
-- 
Alexander Austregesilo

Staff Scientist - Experimental Nuclear Physics
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Newport News, VA
aaustreg at jlab.org
(757) 269-6982
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-cpp/attachments/20240626/d9ea910e/attachment-0001.html>